From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Last minute nominations: mcgrof and toshi
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:28:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469636881.27356.70.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14209.1469636040@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:14 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. Population and update policy: How should we populate the default
> > keyrings and revocation lists? Should we have a built in list of
> > absolute trust that can never be added to? I think the current
> > default here is OK: it's populate with the kernel built in keys and
> > nothing else. If userspace wants to populate with, say, the secure
> > boot keys, then it can do so from init. An issue here is the
> > Microsoft signing key, which most Linux people have but which they
> > wouldn't necessarily consider to be a source of absolute trust.
> > However, third party driver vendors would like a way to get their
> > key trusted by the kernel so they can easily supply modules (This
> > isn't a binary module issue: the code is usually GPL, but the
> > vendors would like to supply updates asynchronously to the distro
> > release cycle). We can say their key should be added as part of the
> > rpm that installs the module, but do users really want this key
> > adding to the default keyring to be trusted for non-module
> > operations?
>
> I have patches that allow the UEFI key and blacklist databases to add to the
> kernel keyrings during boot.
>
> We don't want to permit loading a key from a file once the kernel is booted
> unless that key is signed by a key already in the keyrings.
This is a policy discussion we should have. If you populate the
immutable .builtin_trusted_keys keyring with the secure boot keys, most
people will end up with a Microsoft key in their keyring (and possibly
even some random motherboard vendor ODM key) which they can't remove.
I thought the idea was to use the .secondary_trusted_keys keyring
which is mutable? That way we can have policy in userspace select
which secure boot keys we might like to trust.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 15:26 [Ksummit-discuss] Last minute nominations: mcgrof and toshi Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-08-04 22:20 ` Toshi Kani
2016-07-15 19:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-15 19:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-16 0:52 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-26 14:42 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-27 14:04 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Signature management - keys, modules, firmware, was: " Jason Cooper
2016-07-27 14:08 ` David Howells
2016-07-27 14:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-27 14:23 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-27 14:58 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-27 18:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-07-27 18:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-29 12:29 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-08-05 17:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-08-05 18:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-08-02 12:54 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-02 14:00 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-02 14:09 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <CALCETrUjn7TeGbS4TQ+OFih-nby2Rh54i5177MOwqjTYDBMO=A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrU6aQ5PR_+M7QHkTWos6i6vVS2nvEQDwr5ktBkWu-5MKw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrW8uRK4cuQ+B6NPcO0pY-=-HRDf4LZk4xv2QdPzNEvMCg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrW_mQLmR6g_Ar8Nnpr7CRFZhth=Hj9C901Gj7_WSp=yEQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-02 14:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 14:13 ` James Bottomley
2016-08-03 9:47 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-03 10:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-08-03 10:28 ` Jani Nikula
2016-08-03 10:41 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-03 11:18 ` Jani Nikula
2016-08-03 15:19 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-12 12:38 ` Vinod Koul
2016-08-12 12:39 ` David Woodhouse
2016-08-12 12:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-12 13:00 ` David Woodhouse
2016-08-12 13:12 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-27 15:06 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " James Bottomley
2016-07-27 15:37 ` David Howells
2016-07-27 16:14 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 17:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27 19:00 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27 19:50 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 16:07 ` David Howells
2016-07-27 16:25 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 16:10 ` David Howells
2016-07-27 16:14 ` David Howells
2016-07-27 16:28 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-07-27 16:36 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-27 17:51 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-27 18:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-27 19:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-27 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27 22:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-27 23:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-28 3:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-28 3:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-28 16:57 ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-29 22:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-29 22:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-30 16:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-31 3:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-31 3:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-31 15:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-31 16:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-31 17:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-07-31 18:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 1:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-08-01 17:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-01 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 20:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-01 20:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 20:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-01 21:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 22:56 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-01 23:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 0:33 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <CALCETrXHfUULy-EB13Kbkjwco-2UVgsuRsG+OicZT6_uOkzeqA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrWqpQV1AyxVx5eTkJiOe3t7ZFpSAuN2RG3JNHD-gqm0uA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-02 0:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 1:13 ` James Bottomley
2016-08-02 1:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 18:12 ` James Bottomley
2016-08-01 22:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-08-01 22:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 23:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-08-01 23:04 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-01 23:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-01 23:30 ` Jason Cooper
[not found] ` <CALCETrWDsMdU2-AWQC4wYvotnNd2ydWT15Ckq0nZaNRJZOtZ-g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrW-P8+yGuEgM2BT+aCfZqJ=ekB2Xsz+4xhWtdRpprJHNw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-01 23:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 12:20 ` Jason Cooper
[not found] ` <CALCETrVEY=opRPGKy=P9h8s+TC_K19WnBJ2svXT+=_FnqRF1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CALCETrVZtn_SmeN1YX9_+2g+bEAHsfJJ7KQH7-eC_mU3O+0x2w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-02 15:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-03 16:44 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-03 17:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-03 17:50 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-01 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-02 18:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 19:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-02 19:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 19:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-02 19:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-02 19:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-02 20:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-29 12:43 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-07-29 17:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-08-01 10:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1469636881.27356.70.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.