All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: task_mmu: Reduce output processing cpu time
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:30:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471854614.3746.46.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471852859.3746.42.camel@perches.com>

On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 01:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 09:24 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 20-08-16 01:00:17, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > > static int proc_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> > >  			const struct seq_operations *ops, int psize)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct proc_maps_private *priv = __seq_open_private(file, ops, psize);
> > > +	struct proc_maps_private *priv;
> > > +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> > > +
> > > +	mm = proc_mem_open(inode, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(mm))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(mm);
> > >  
> > > +	priv = __seq_open_private_bufsize(file, ops, psize,
> > > +					  mm && mm->map_count ?
> > > +					  mm->map_count * 0x300 : PAGE_SIZE);
> > NAK to this!
> > 
> > Seriously, this just gives any random user access to user
> > defined amount of memory which not accounted, not reclaimable and a
> > potential consumer of any higher order blocks.
> I completely disagree here with your rationale here.

And with further review and your comment above, I withdraw this patch.
cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: task_mmu: Reduce output processing cpu time
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:30:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471854614.3746.46.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471852859.3746.42.camel@perches.com>

On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 01:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 09:24 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 20-08-16 01:00:17, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > > static int proc_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> > >  			const struct seq_operations *ops, int psize)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct proc_maps_private *priv = __seq_open_private(file, ops, psize);
> > > +	struct proc_maps_private *priv;
> > > +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> > > +
> > > +	mm = proc_mem_open(inode, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(mm))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(mm);
> > >  
> > > +	priv = __seq_open_private_bufsize(file, ops, psize,
> > > +					  mm && mm->map_count ?
> > > +					  mm->map_count * 0x300 : PAGE_SIZE);
> > NAK to this!
> > 
> > Seriously, this just gives any random user access to user
> > defined amount of memory which not accounted, not reclaimable and a
> > potential consumer of any higher order blocks.
> I completely disagree here with your rationale here.

And with further review and your comment above, I withdraw this patch.
cheers, Joe

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-18 11:31 [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 13:26 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 13:26   ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:26   ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:26     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:41     ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:41       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:41     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:41       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:46       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:46         ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:58         ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:58           ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 15:23           ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 15:23             ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 16:42             ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 16:42               ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs, proc: optimize smaps output formatting Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12   ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12   ` [PATCH 1/2] proc, meminfo: abstract show_val_kb Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-26  2:54     ` [proc, meminfo] dd3b422c11: stderr.Signal#(FPE)caught_by_ps(procps-ng_version#) kernel test robot
2016-08-26  2:54       ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2016-08-19 10:13   ` [PATCH 2/2] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:13     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 17:43   ` [PATCH 0/2] fs, proc: optimize smaps output formatting Joe Perches
2016-08-19 17:43     ` Joe Perches
2016-08-19 20:18     ` Joe Perches
2016-08-19 20:18       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20  7:29     ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-20  7:29       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-20  7:55       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20  7:55         ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00       ` [PATCH 0/2] seq: Speed up /proc/<pid>/smaps Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00         ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00         ` [PATCH 1/2] seq_file: Add __seq_open_private_bufsize for seq file_operation sizes Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00           ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00         ` [PATCH 2/2] proc: task_mmu: Reduce output processing cpu time Joe Perches
2016-08-20  8:00           ` Joe Perches
2016-08-22  7:24           ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22  7:24             ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22  8:00             ` Joe Perches
2016-08-22  8:00               ` Joe Perches
2016-08-22  8:30               ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-08-22  8:30                 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-22 12:09                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 12:09                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-23 15:14 ` [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
2016-08-23 15:14   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1471854614.3746.46.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jann@thejh.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.