From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, "Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Drew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] powerpc: Check whether TM is available before running other tests
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:25:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475652308.2070.2.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475572050-13164-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:07 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Transactional memory is currently only supported on KVM-HV, and
> not yet on KVM-PR. So it's better to check the device tree first
> and fail gracefully if it is not available.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Thanks for sending a v3.
Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Removed unnecessary check for "plen >= 26" in cpu_has_tm()
>
> v2:
> - Reworked the check for the "ibm,pa-features" and added a comment
> - Use a dedicated variable "has_tm" instead of "i" in main()
>
> powerpc/tm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/powerpc/tm.c b/powerpc/tm.c
> index 6ce750a..b611061 100644
> --- a/powerpc/tm.c
> +++ b/powerpc/tm.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,41 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/handlers.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
> +#include <devicetree.h>
> +
> +/* Check "ibm,pa-features" property of a CPU node for the TM flag */
> +static void cpu_has_tm(int fdtnode, u32 regval __unused, void *ptr)
> +{
> + const struct fdt_property *prop;
> + int plen;
> +
> + prop = fdt_get_property(dt_fdt(), fdtnode, "ibm,pa-
> features", &plen);
> + if (!prop) /* No features means TM is also not
> available */
> + return;
> + /* Sanity check for the property layout (first two bytes are
> header) */
> + assert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] = 0 && prop->data[0] <> plen - 2);
> +
> + /*
> + * The "Transactional Memory Category Support" flags are at
> byte
> + * offset 22 and 23 of the attribute type 0, so when adding
> the
> + * two bytes for the header, we've got to look at offset 24
> for
> + * the TM support bit.
> + */
> + if (prop->data[0] >= 24 && (prop->data[24] & 0x80) != 0)
> + *(int *)ptr += 1;
> +}
> +
> +/* Check whether all CPU nodes have the TM flag */
> +static bool all_cpus_have_tm(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int available = 0;
> +
> + ret = dt_for_each_cpu_node(cpu_has_tm, &available);
> +
> + return ret = 0 && available = nr_cpus;
> +}
>
> static int h_cede(void)
> {
> @@ -101,11 +136,17 @@ struct {
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> - bool all;
> + bool all, has_tm;
> int i;
>
> report_prefix_push("tm");
>
> + has_tm = all_cpus_have_tm();
> + report_xfail("TM available in 'ibm,pa-features' property",
> + !has_tm, has_tm);
> + if (!has_tm)
> + return report_summary();
> +
> all = argc = 1 || !strcmp(argv[1], "all");
>
> for (i = 0; hctests[i].name != NULL; i++) {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, "Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Drew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] powerpc: Check whether TM is available before running other tests
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:25:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475652308.2070.2.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475572050-13164-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:07 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Transactional memory is currently only supported on KVM-HV, and
> not yet on KVM-PR. So it's better to check the device tree first
> and fail gracefully if it is not available.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Thanks for sending a v3.
Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Removed unnecessary check for "plen >= 26" in cpu_has_tm()
>
> v2:
> - Reworked the check for the "ibm,pa-features" and added a comment
> - Use a dedicated variable "has_tm" instead of "i" in main()
>
> powerpc/tm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/powerpc/tm.c b/powerpc/tm.c
> index 6ce750a..b611061 100644
> --- a/powerpc/tm.c
> +++ b/powerpc/tm.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,41 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/handlers.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
> +#include <devicetree.h>
> +
> +/* Check "ibm,pa-features" property of a CPU node for the TM flag */
> +static void cpu_has_tm(int fdtnode, u32 regval __unused, void *ptr)
> +{
> + const struct fdt_property *prop;
> + int plen;
> +
> + prop = fdt_get_property(dt_fdt(), fdtnode, "ibm,pa-
> features", &plen);
> + if (!prop) /* No features means TM is also not
> available */
> + return;
> + /* Sanity check for the property layout (first two bytes are
> header) */
> + assert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] == 0 && prop->data[0] <=
> plen - 2);
> +
> + /*
> + * The "Transactional Memory Category Support" flags are at
> byte
> + * offset 22 and 23 of the attribute type 0, so when adding
> the
> + * two bytes for the header, we've got to look at offset 24
> for
> + * the TM support bit.
> + */
> + if (prop->data[0] >= 24 && (prop->data[24] & 0x80) != 0)
> + *(int *)ptr += 1;
> +}
> +
> +/* Check whether all CPU nodes have the TM flag */
> +static bool all_cpus_have_tm(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int available = 0;
> +
> + ret = dt_for_each_cpu_node(cpu_has_tm, &available);
> +
> + return ret == 0 && available == nr_cpus;
> +}
>
> static int h_cede(void)
> {
> @@ -101,11 +136,17 @@ struct {
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> - bool all;
> + bool all, has_tm;
> int i;
>
> report_prefix_push("tm");
>
> + has_tm = all_cpus_have_tm();
> + report_xfail("TM available in 'ibm,pa-features' property",
> + !has_tm, has_tm);
> + if (!has_tm)
> + return report_summary();
> +
> all = argc == 1 || !strcmp(argv[1], "all");
>
> for (i = 0; hctests[i].name != NULL; i++) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 9:07 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] powerpc: Check whether TM is available before running other tests Thomas Huth
2016-10-04 9:07 ` Thomas Huth
2016-10-04 9:45 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-10-04 9:45 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-10-05 7:25 ` Suraj Jitindar Singh [this message]
2016-10-05 7:25 ` Suraj Jitindar Singh
2016-10-12 8:04 ` Thomas Huth
2016-10-12 8:04 ` Thomas Huth
2016-10-12 8:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 8:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 14:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-12 14:49 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475652308.2070.2.camel@gmail.com \
--to=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.