All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dump: Add checking for writable and exectuable pages
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:32:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476311522-15381-5-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476311522-15381-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>


Page mappings with full RWX permissions are a security risk. x86
has an option to walk the page tables and dump any bad pages.
(See e1a58320a38d ("x86/mm: Warn on W^X mappings")). Add a similar
implementation for arm64.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
---
v2: Check only init_mm, style cleanups, UXN checks, compiliation fixes for
    disabled case.
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug        | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h |  8 +++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/dump.c            | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c             |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
index 21a5b74..3f627c94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -42,6 +42,36 @@ config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
 	  of TEXT_OFFSET and platforms must not require a specific
 	  value.
 
+config DEBUG_WX
+	bool "Warn on W+X mappings at boot"
+	select ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE
+	---help---
+	  Generate a warning if any W+X mappings are found at boot.
+
+	  This is useful for discovering cases where the kernel is leaving
+	  W+X mappings after applying NX, as such mappings are a security risk.
+	  This check also includes UXN, which should be set on all kernel
+	  mappings.
+
+	  Look for a message in dmesg output like this:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found.
+
+	  or like this, if the check failed:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, <N> W+X pages found.
+
+	  Note that even if the check fails, your kernel is possibly
+	  still fine, as W+X mappings are not a security hole in
+	  themselves, what they do is that they make the exploitation
+	  of other unfixed kernel bugs easier.
+
+	  There is no runtime or memory usage effect of this option
+	  once the kernel has booted up - it's a one time check.
+
+	  If in doubt, say "Y".
+
+
 config DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
 	bool "Set loadable kernel module data as NX and text as RO"
 	depends on MODULES
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
index 8fc0957..6afd847 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
@@ -42,5 +42,13 @@ static inline int ptdump_debugfs_register(struct ptdump_info *info,
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
+void ptdump_check_wx(void);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WX
+#define debug_checkwx()	ptdump_check_wx()
+#else
+#define debug_checkwx()	do { } while (0)
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASM_PTDUMP_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
index bb36649..4913af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct pg_state {
 	unsigned long start_address;
 	unsigned level;
 	u64 current_prot;
+	bool check_wx;
+	unsigned long wx_pages;
 };
 
 struct prot_bits {
@@ -202,6 +204,35 @@ static void dump_prot(struct pg_state *st, const struct prot_bits *bits,
 	}
 }
 
+static void note_prot_uxn(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_UXN) == PTE_UXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found non-UXN mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
+static void note_prot_wx(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_RDONLY) == PTE_RDONLY)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_PXN) == PTE_PXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
 static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 				u64 val)
 {
@@ -219,6 +250,8 @@ static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 		unsigned long delta;
 
 		if (st->current_prot) {
+			note_prot_uxn(st, addr);
+			note_prot_wx(st, addr);
 			pt_dump_seq_printf(st->seq, "0x%016lx-0x%016lx   ",
 				   st->start_address, addr);
 
@@ -344,6 +377,25 @@ static struct ptdump_info kernel_ptdump_info = {
 	.base_addr	= VA_START,
 };
 
+void ptdump_check_wx(void)
+{
+	struct pg_state st = {
+		.seq = NULL,
+		.marker = (struct addr_marker[]) {
+			{ -1, NULL},
+		},
+		.check_wx = true,
+	};
+
+	walk_pgd(&st, &init_mm, 0);
+	note_page(&st, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (st.wx_pages)
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, %lu W+X pages found\n",
+			st.wx_pages);
+	else
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found\n");
+}
+
 static int ptdump_init(void)
 {
 	ptdump_initialize();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 05615a3..2cbe2fe 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
 
 u64 idmap_t0sz = TCR_T0SZ(VA_BITS);
 
@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
 	section_size = (unsigned long)__init_begin - (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
 	create_mapping_late(__pa(__start_rodata), (unsigned long)__start_rodata,
 			    section_size, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
+	debug_checkwx();
 }
 
 static void __init map_kernel_segment(pgd_t *pgd, void *va_start, void *va_end,
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dump: Add checking for writable and exectuable pages
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:32:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476311522-15381-5-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476311522-15381-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>


Page mappings with full RWX permissions are a security risk. x86
has an option to walk the page tables and dump any bad pages.
(See e1a58320a38d ("x86/mm: Warn on W^X mappings")). Add a similar
implementation for arm64.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
---
v2: Check only init_mm, style cleanups, UXN checks, compiliation fixes for
    disabled case.
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug        | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h |  8 +++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/dump.c            | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c             |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
index 21a5b74..3f627c94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -42,6 +42,36 @@ config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
 	  of TEXT_OFFSET and platforms must not require a specific
 	  value.
 
+config DEBUG_WX
+	bool "Warn on W+X mappings at boot"
+	select ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE
+	---help---
+	  Generate a warning if any W+X mappings are found at boot.
+
+	  This is useful for discovering cases where the kernel is leaving
+	  W+X mappings after applying NX, as such mappings are a security risk.
+	  This check also includes UXN, which should be set on all kernel
+	  mappings.
+
+	  Look for a message in dmesg output like this:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found.
+
+	  or like this, if the check failed:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, <N> W+X pages found.
+
+	  Note that even if the check fails, your kernel is possibly
+	  still fine, as W+X mappings are not a security hole in
+	  themselves, what they do is that they make the exploitation
+	  of other unfixed kernel bugs easier.
+
+	  There is no runtime or memory usage effect of this option
+	  once the kernel has booted up - it's a one time check.
+
+	  If in doubt, say "Y".
+
+
 config DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
 	bool "Set loadable kernel module data as NX and text as RO"
 	depends on MODULES
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
index 8fc0957..6afd847 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
@@ -42,5 +42,13 @@ static inline int ptdump_debugfs_register(struct ptdump_info *info,
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
+void ptdump_check_wx(void);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WX
+#define debug_checkwx()	ptdump_check_wx()
+#else
+#define debug_checkwx()	do { } while (0)
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASM_PTDUMP_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
index bb36649..4913af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct pg_state {
 	unsigned long start_address;
 	unsigned level;
 	u64 current_prot;
+	bool check_wx;
+	unsigned long wx_pages;
 };
 
 struct prot_bits {
@@ -202,6 +204,35 @@ static void dump_prot(struct pg_state *st, const struct prot_bits *bits,
 	}
 }
 
+static void note_prot_uxn(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_UXN) == PTE_UXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found non-UXN mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
+static void note_prot_wx(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_RDONLY) == PTE_RDONLY)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_PXN) == PTE_PXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
 static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 				u64 val)
 {
@@ -219,6 +250,8 @@ static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 		unsigned long delta;
 
 		if (st->current_prot) {
+			note_prot_uxn(st, addr);
+			note_prot_wx(st, addr);
 			pt_dump_seq_printf(st->seq, "0x%016lx-0x%016lx   ",
 				   st->start_address, addr);
 
@@ -344,6 +377,25 @@ static struct ptdump_info kernel_ptdump_info = {
 	.base_addr	= VA_START,
 };
 
+void ptdump_check_wx(void)
+{
+	struct pg_state st = {
+		.seq = NULL,
+		.marker = (struct addr_marker[]) {
+			{ -1, NULL},
+		},
+		.check_wx = true,
+	};
+
+	walk_pgd(&st, &init_mm, 0);
+	note_page(&st, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (st.wx_pages)
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, %lu W+X pages found\n",
+			st.wx_pages);
+	else
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found\n");
+}
+
 static int ptdump_init(void)
 {
 	ptdump_initialize();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 05615a3..2cbe2fe 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
 
 u64 idmap_t0sz = TCR_T0SZ(VA_BITS);
 
@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
 	section_size = (unsigned long)__init_begin - (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
 	create_mapping_late(__pa(__start_rodata), (unsigned long)__start_rodata,
 			    section_size, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
+	debug_checkwx();
 }
 
 static void __init map_kernel_segment(pgd_t *pgd, void *va_start, void *va_end,
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dump: Add checking for writable and exectuable pages
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:32:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476311522-15381-5-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476311522-15381-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>


Page mappings with full RWX permissions are a security risk. x86
has an option to walk the page tables and dump any bad pages.
(See e1a58320a38d ("x86/mm: Warn on W^X mappings")). Add a similar
implementation for arm64.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
---
v2: Check only init_mm, style cleanups, UXN checks, compiliation fixes for
    disabled case.
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug        | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h |  8 +++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/dump.c            | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c             |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
index 21a5b74..3f627c94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -42,6 +42,36 @@ config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
 	  of TEXT_OFFSET and platforms must not require a specific
 	  value.
 
+config DEBUG_WX
+	bool "Warn on W+X mappings at boot"
+	select ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE
+	---help---
+	  Generate a warning if any W+X mappings are found at boot.
+
+	  This is useful for discovering cases where the kernel is leaving
+	  W+X mappings after applying NX, as such mappings are a security risk.
+	  This check also includes UXN, which should be set on all kernel
+	  mappings.
+
+	  Look for a message in dmesg output like this:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found.
+
+	  or like this, if the check failed:
+
+	    arm64/mm: Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, <N> W+X pages found.
+
+	  Note that even if the check fails, your kernel is possibly
+	  still fine, as W+X mappings are not a security hole in
+	  themselves, what they do is that they make the exploitation
+	  of other unfixed kernel bugs easier.
+
+	  There is no runtime or memory usage effect of this option
+	  once the kernel has booted up - it's a one time check.
+
+	  If in doubt, say "Y".
+
+
 config DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
 	bool "Set loadable kernel module data as NX and text as RO"
 	depends on MODULES
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
index 8fc0957..6afd847 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h
@@ -42,5 +42,13 @@ static inline int ptdump_debugfs_register(struct ptdump_info *info,
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
+void ptdump_check_wx(void);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP_CORE */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_WX
+#define debug_checkwx()	ptdump_check_wx()
+#else
+#define debug_checkwx()	do { } while (0)
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASM_PTDUMP_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
index bb36649..4913af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dump.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct pg_state {
 	unsigned long start_address;
 	unsigned level;
 	u64 current_prot;
+	bool check_wx;
+	unsigned long wx_pages;
 };
 
 struct prot_bits {
@@ -202,6 +204,35 @@ static void dump_prot(struct pg_state *st, const struct prot_bits *bits,
 	}
 }
 
+static void note_prot_uxn(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_UXN) == PTE_UXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found non-UXN mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
+static void note_prot_wx(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (!st->check_wx)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_RDONLY) == PTE_RDONLY)
+		return;
+	if ((st->current_prot & PTE_PXN) == PTE_PXN)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "arm64/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address %p/%pS\n",
+		  (void *)st->start_address, (void *)st->start_address);
+
+	st->wx_pages += (addr - st->start_address) / PAGE_SIZE;
+}
+
 static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 				u64 val)
 {
@@ -219,6 +250,8 @@ static void note_page(struct pg_state *st, unsigned long addr, unsigned level,
 		unsigned long delta;
 
 		if (st->current_prot) {
+			note_prot_uxn(st, addr);
+			note_prot_wx(st, addr);
 			pt_dump_seq_printf(st->seq, "0x%016lx-0x%016lx   ",
 				   st->start_address, addr);
 
@@ -344,6 +377,25 @@ static struct ptdump_info kernel_ptdump_info = {
 	.base_addr	= VA_START,
 };
 
+void ptdump_check_wx(void)
+{
+	struct pg_state st = {
+		.seq = NULL,
+		.marker = (struct addr_marker[]) {
+			{ -1, NULL},
+		},
+		.check_wx = true,
+	};
+
+	walk_pgd(&st, &init_mm, 0);
+	note_page(&st, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (st.wx_pages)
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, %lu W+X pages found\n",
+			st.wx_pages);
+	else
+		pr_info("Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found\n");
+}
+
 static int ptdump_init(void)
 {
 	ptdump_initialize();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 05615a3..2cbe2fe 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
 
 u64 idmap_t0sz = TCR_T0SZ(VA_BITS);
 
@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
 	section_size = (unsigned long)__init_begin - (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
 	create_mapping_late(__pa(__start_rodata), (unsigned long)__start_rodata,
 			    section_size, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
+	debug_checkwx();
 }
 
 static void __init map_kernel_segment(pgd_t *pgd, void *va_start, void *va_end,
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-12 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 22:31 [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 0/4] WX checking for arm64 Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:31 ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:31 ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:31 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 1/4] arm64: dump: Make ptdump debugfs a separate option Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:31   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:31   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:45   ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-10-12 22:45     ` Kees Cook
2016-10-12 22:45     ` Kees Cook
2016-10-12 22:57     ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:57       ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:57       ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 23:13       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-10-12 23:13         ` Kees Cook
2016-10-12 23:13         ` Kees Cook
2016-10-17 10:52   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 10:52     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 10:52     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 22:16     ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2016-10-17 22:16       ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-17 22:16       ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: dump: Make the page table dumping seq_file optional Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-17 11:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 11:02     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 11:02     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-12 22:32 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 3/4] arm64: dump: Remove max_addr Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-17 11:05   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 11:05     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 11:05     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-12 22:32 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2016-10-12 22:32   ` [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dump: Add checking for writable and exectuable pages Laura Abbott
2016-10-12 22:32   ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-17 12:47   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 12:47     ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-17 12:47     ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476311522-15381-5-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com \
    --to=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.