All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:57:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491148665.3480.8.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170401125519.7339-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 14:55 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> It seems that the "cpu_clk" was carried over from the meson8b clock
> controller driver. On Meson GX (GXBB/GXL/GXM) the registers which are
> used by the cpu_clk have a different purpose (in other words: they don't
> control the CPU clock anymore). HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1 bits 31:24 are
> reserved according to the public S905 datasheet, while bit 23 is the
> "A53_trace_clk_DIS" gate (which according to the datasheet should only
> be used in case a silicon bug is discovered) and bits 22:20 are a
> divider (A53_trace_clk). The meson clk-cpu code however expects that
> bits 28:20 are reserved for a divider (according to the public S805
> datasheet this "SCALE_DIV: This value represents an N+1 divider of the
> input clock.").
> 
> The CPU clock on Meson GX SoCs is provided by the SCPI DVFS clock
> driver instead. Two examples from a Meson GXL S905X SoC:
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1000000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1512000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> 
> Unfortunately the CLKID_CPUCLK was already exported (but is currently
> not used) to DT. Due to the removal of this clock definition there is
> now a hole in the clk_hw_onecell_data (which is not a problem because
> this case is already handled in gxbb_clkc_probe).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Looks good to me.
I'll wait for the Ack of one of the DT maintainers to apply it.
Thx Martin

Cheers

> ---
> ?drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c??????????????| 64 ++------------------------------
> ---
> ?drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h??????????????|??2 +-
> ?include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h |??1 -
> ?3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> index ad5f027af1a2..7cf88ca9bdce 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> @@ -278,20 +278,6 @@ static const struct pll_rate_table
> gxl_gp0_pll_rate_table[] = {
> ?	{ /* sentinel */ },
> ?};
> ?
> -static const struct clk_div_table cpu_div_table[] = {
> -	{ .val = 1, .div = 1 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 2 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 3 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 4 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 6 },
> -	{ .val = 4, .div = 8 },
> -	{ .val = 5, .div = 10 },
> -	{ .val = 6, .div = 12 },
> -	{ .val = 7, .div = 14 },
> -	{ .val = 8, .div = 16 },
> -	{ /* sentinel */ },
> -};
> -
> ?static struct meson_clk_pll gxbb_fixed_pll = {
> ?	.m = {
> ?		.reg_off = HHI_MPLL_CNTL,
> @@ -612,21 +598,10 @@ static struct meson_clk_mpll gxbb_mpll2 = {
> ?};
> ?
> ?/*
> - * FIXME cpu clocks and the legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL
> - * post-dividers and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the
> - * forthcoming coordinated clock rates feature
> + * FIXME The legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL post-dividers
> + * and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the forthcoming
> + * coordinated clock rates feature
> ? */
> -static struct meson_clk_cpu gxbb_cpu_clk = {
> -	.reg_off = HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1,
> -	.div_table = cpu_div_table,
> -	.clk_nb.notifier_call = meson_clk_cpu_notifier_cb,
> -	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> -		.name = "cpu_clk",
> -		.ops = &meson_clk_cpu_ops,
> -		.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "sys_pll" },
> -		.num_parents = 1,
> -	},
> -};
> ?
> ?static u32 mux_table_clk81[]	= { 6, 5, 7 };
> ?
> @@ -1045,7 +1020,6 @@ static MESON_GATE(gxbb_ao_i2c, HHI_GCLK_AO, 4);
> ?static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data = {
> ?	.hws = {
> ?		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		????= &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		????= &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	????= &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	????= &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	????= &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1165,7 +1139,6 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data =
> {
> ?static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxl_hw_onecell_data = {
> ?	.hws = {
> ?		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		????= &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		????= &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	????= &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	????= &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	????= &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1430,7 +1403,6 @@ struct clkc_data {
> ?	unsigned int clk_dividers_count;
> ?	struct meson_clk_audio_divider *const *clk_audio_dividers;
> ?	unsigned int clk_audio_dividers_count;
> -	struct meson_clk_cpu *cpu_clk;
> ?	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_onecell_data;
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1447,7 +1419,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxbb_clkc_data = {
> ?	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
> ?	.hw_onecell_data = &gxbb_hw_onecell_data,
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1464,7 +1435,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxl_clkc_data = {
> ?	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
> ?	.hw_onecell_data = &gxl_hw_onecell_data,
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1479,8 +1449,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?	const struct clkc_data *clkc_data;
> ?	void __iomem *clk_base;
> ?	int ret, clkid, i;
> -	struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
> -	struct clk *parent_clk;
> ?	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> ?
> ?	clkc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1502,9 +1470,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_mplls_count; i++)
> ?		clkc_data->clk_mplls[i]->base = clk_base;
> ?
> -	/* Populate the base address for CPU clk */
> -	clkc_data->cpu_clk->base = clk_base;
> -
> ?	/* Populate base address for gates */
> ?	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_gates_count; i++)
> ?		clkc_data->clk_gates[i]->reg = clk_base +
> @@ -1538,29 +1503,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> ?			goto iounmap;
> ?	}
> ?
> -	/*
> -	?* Register CPU clk notifier
> -	?*
> -	?* FIXME this is wrong for a lot of reasons. First, the muxes should
> be
> -	?* struct clk_hw objects. Second, we shouldn't program the muxes in
> -	?* notifier handlers. The tricky programming sequence will be handled
> -	?* by the forthcoming coordinated clock rates mechanism once that
> -	?* feature is released.
> -	?*
> -	?* Furthermore, looking up the parent this way is terrible. At some
> -	?* point we will stop allocating a default struct clk when
> registering
> -	?* a new clk_hw, and this hack will no longer work. Releasing the ccr
> -	?* feature before that time solves the problem :-)
> -	?*/
> -	parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(&clkc_data->cpu_clk->hw);
> -	parent_clk = parent_hw->clk;
> -	ret = clk_notifier_register(parent_clk, &clkc_data->cpu_clk->clk_nb);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("%s: failed to register clock notifier for cpu_clk\n",
> -				__func__);
> -		goto iounmap;
> -	}
> -
> ?	return of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
> ?			clkc_data->hw_onecell_data);
> ?
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> index 17c6aef033ff..36330c2d4433 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
> ? * to be exposed to client nodes in DT: include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> ? */
> ?#define CLKID_SYS_PLL		??0
> -/* CLKID_CPUCLK */
> +/* ID 1 is unused (it was used by the non-existing CLKID_CPUCLK before) */
> ?/* CLKID_HDMI_PLL */
> ?#define CLKID_FIXED_PLL		??3
> ?/* CLKID_FCLK_DIV2 */
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h b/include/dt-
> bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> index 4516bc4253b5..54faf83a4851 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> ?#ifndef __GXBB_CLKC_H
> ?#define __GXBB_CLKC_H
> ?
> -#define CLKID_CPUCLK		1
> ?#define CLKID_HDMI_PLL		2
> ?#define CLKID_FCLK_DIV2		4
> ?#define CLKID_FCLK_DIV3		5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: khilman@baylibre.com, carlo@caione.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:57:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491148665.3480.8.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170401125519.7339-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 14:55 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> It seems that the "cpu_clk" was carried over from the meson8b clock
> controller driver. On Meson GX (GXBB/GXL/GXM) the registers which are
> used by the cpu_clk have a different purpose (in other words: they don't
> control the CPU clock anymore). HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1 bits 31:24 are
> reserved according to the public S905 datasheet, while bit 23 is the
> "A53_trace_clk_DIS" gate (which according to the datasheet should only
> be used in case a silicon bug is discovered) and bits 22:20 are a
> divider (A53_trace_clk). The meson clk-cpu code however expects that
> bits 28:20 are reserved for a divider (according to the public S805
> datasheet this "SCALE_DIV: This value represents an N+1 divider of the
> input clock.").
> 
> The CPU clock on Meson GX SoCs is provided by the SCPI DVFS clock
> driver instead. Two examples from a Meson GXL S905X SoC:
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1000000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1512000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> 
> Unfortunately the CLKID_CPUCLK was already exported (but is currently
> not used) to DT. Due to the removal of this clock definition there is
> now a hole in the clk_hw_onecell_data (which is not a problem because
> this case is already handled in gxbb_clkc_probe).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Looks good to me.
I'll wait for the Ack of one of the DT maintainers to apply it.
Thx Martin

Cheers

> ---
>  drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c              | 64 ++------------------------------
> ---
>  drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h              |  2 +-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> index ad5f027af1a2..7cf88ca9bdce 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> @@ -278,20 +278,6 @@ static const struct pll_rate_table
> gxl_gp0_pll_rate_table[] = {
>  	{ /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  
> -static const struct clk_div_table cpu_div_table[] = {
> -	{ .val = 1, .div = 1 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 2 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 3 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 4 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 6 },
> -	{ .val = 4, .div = 8 },
> -	{ .val = 5, .div = 10 },
> -	{ .val = 6, .div = 12 },
> -	{ .val = 7, .div = 14 },
> -	{ .val = 8, .div = 16 },
> -	{ /* sentinel */ },
> -};
> -
>  static struct meson_clk_pll gxbb_fixed_pll = {
>  	.m = {
>  		.reg_off = HHI_MPLL_CNTL,
> @@ -612,21 +598,10 @@ static struct meson_clk_mpll gxbb_mpll2 = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * FIXME cpu clocks and the legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL
> - * post-dividers and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the
> - * forthcoming coordinated clock rates feature
> + * FIXME The legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL post-dividers
> + * and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the forthcoming
> + * coordinated clock rates feature
>   */
> -static struct meson_clk_cpu gxbb_cpu_clk = {
> -	.reg_off = HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1,
> -	.div_table = cpu_div_table,
> -	.clk_nb.notifier_call = meson_clk_cpu_notifier_cb,
> -	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> -		.name = "cpu_clk",
> -		.ops = &meson_clk_cpu_ops,
> -		.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "sys_pll" },
> -		.num_parents = 1,
> -	},
> -};
>  
>  static u32 mux_table_clk81[]	= { 6, 5, 7 };
>  
> @@ -1045,7 +1020,6 @@ static MESON_GATE(gxbb_ao_i2c, HHI_GCLK_AO, 4);
>  static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data = {
>  	.hws = {
>  		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		    = &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		    = &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
>  		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	    = &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	    = &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	    = &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1165,7 +1139,6 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data =
> {
>  static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxl_hw_onecell_data = {
>  	.hws = {
>  		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		    = &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		    = &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
>  		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	    = &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	    = &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	    = &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1430,7 +1403,6 @@ struct clkc_data {
>  	unsigned int clk_dividers_count;
>  	struct meson_clk_audio_divider *const *clk_audio_dividers;
>  	unsigned int clk_audio_dividers_count;
> -	struct meson_clk_cpu *cpu_clk;
>  	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_onecell_data;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1447,7 +1419,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxbb_clkc_data = {
>  	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
>  	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
>  	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
>  	.hw_onecell_data = &gxbb_hw_onecell_data,
>  };
>  
> @@ -1464,7 +1435,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxl_clkc_data = {
>  	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
>  	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
>  	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
>  	.hw_onecell_data = &gxl_hw_onecell_data,
>  };
>  
> @@ -1479,8 +1449,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct clkc_data *clkc_data;
>  	void __iomem *clk_base;
>  	int ret, clkid, i;
> -	struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
> -	struct clk *parent_clk;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  
>  	clkc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1502,9 +1470,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_mplls_count; i++)
>  		clkc_data->clk_mplls[i]->base = clk_base;
>  
> -	/* Populate the base address for CPU clk */
> -	clkc_data->cpu_clk->base = clk_base;
> -
>  	/* Populate base address for gates */
>  	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_gates_count; i++)
>  		clkc_data->clk_gates[i]->reg = clk_base +
> @@ -1538,29 +1503,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  			goto iounmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Register CPU clk notifier
> -	 *
> -	 * FIXME this is wrong for a lot of reasons. First, the muxes should
> be
> -	 * struct clk_hw objects. Second, we shouldn't program the muxes in
> -	 * notifier handlers. The tricky programming sequence will be handled
> -	 * by the forthcoming coordinated clock rates mechanism once that
> -	 * feature is released.
> -	 *
> -	 * Furthermore, looking up the parent this way is terrible. At some
> -	 * point we will stop allocating a default struct clk when
> registering
> -	 * a new clk_hw, and this hack will no longer work. Releasing the ccr
> -	 * feature before that time solves the problem :-)
> -	 */
> -	parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(&clkc_data->cpu_clk->hw);
> -	parent_clk = parent_hw->clk;
> -	ret = clk_notifier_register(parent_clk, &clkc_data->cpu_clk->clk_nb);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("%s: failed to register clock notifier for cpu_clk\n",
> -				__func__);
> -		goto iounmap;
> -	}
> -
>  	return of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>  			clkc_data->hw_onecell_data);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> index 17c6aef033ff..36330c2d4433 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
>   * to be exposed to client nodes in DT: include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
>   */
>  #define CLKID_SYS_PLL		  0
> -/* CLKID_CPUCLK */
> +/* ID 1 is unused (it was used by the non-existing CLKID_CPUCLK before) */
>  /* CLKID_HDMI_PLL */
>  #define CLKID_FIXED_PLL		  3
>  /* CLKID_FCLK_DIV2 */
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h b/include/dt-
> bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> index 4516bc4253b5..54faf83a4851 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
>  #ifndef __GXBB_CLKC_H
>  #define __GXBB_CLKC_H
>  
> -#define CLKID_CPUCLK		1
>  #define CLKID_HDMI_PLL		2
>  #define CLKID_FCLK_DIV2		4
>  #define CLKID_FCLK_DIV3		5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:57:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491148665.3480.8.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170401125519.7339-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 14:55 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> It seems that the "cpu_clk" was carried over from the meson8b clock
> controller driver. On Meson GX (GXBB/GXL/GXM) the registers which are
> used by the cpu_clk have a different purpose (in other words: they don't
> control the CPU clock anymore). HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1 bits 31:24 are
> reserved according to the public S905 datasheet, while bit 23 is the
> "A53_trace_clk_DIS" gate (which according to the datasheet should only
> be used in case a silicon bug is discovered) and bits 22:20 are a
> divider (A53_trace_clk). The meson clk-cpu code however expects that
> bits 28:20 are reserved for a divider (according to the public S805
> datasheet this "SCALE_DIV: This value represents an N+1 divider of the
> input clock.").
> 
> The CPU clock on Meson GX SoCs is provided by the SCPI DVFS clock
> driver instead. Two examples from a Meson GXL S905X SoC:
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1000000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1512000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> 
> Unfortunately the CLKID_CPUCLK was already exported (but is currently
> not used) to DT. Due to the removal of this clock definition there is
> now a hole in the clk_hw_onecell_data (which is not a problem because
> this case is already handled in gxbb_clkc_probe).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Looks good to me.
I'll wait for the Ack of one of the DT maintainers to apply it.
Thx Martin

Cheers

> ---
> ?drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c??????????????| 64 ++------------------------------
> ---
> ?drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h??????????????|??2 +-
> ?include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h |??1 -
> ?3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> index ad5f027af1a2..7cf88ca9bdce 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> @@ -278,20 +278,6 @@ static const struct pll_rate_table
> gxl_gp0_pll_rate_table[] = {
> ?	{ /* sentinel */ },
> ?};
> ?
> -static const struct clk_div_table cpu_div_table[] = {
> -	{ .val = 1, .div = 1 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 2 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 3 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 4 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 6 },
> -	{ .val = 4, .div = 8 },
> -	{ .val = 5, .div = 10 },
> -	{ .val = 6, .div = 12 },
> -	{ .val = 7, .div = 14 },
> -	{ .val = 8, .div = 16 },
> -	{ /* sentinel */ },
> -};
> -
> ?static struct meson_clk_pll gxbb_fixed_pll = {
> ?	.m = {
> ?		.reg_off = HHI_MPLL_CNTL,
> @@ -612,21 +598,10 @@ static struct meson_clk_mpll gxbb_mpll2 = {
> ?};
> ?
> ?/*
> - * FIXME cpu clocks and the legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL
> - * post-dividers and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the
> - * forthcoming coordinated clock rates feature
> + * FIXME The legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL post-dividers
> + * and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the forthcoming
> + * coordinated clock rates feature
> ? */
> -static struct meson_clk_cpu gxbb_cpu_clk = {
> -	.reg_off = HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1,
> -	.div_table = cpu_div_table,
> -	.clk_nb.notifier_call = meson_clk_cpu_notifier_cb,
> -	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> -		.name = "cpu_clk",
> -		.ops = &meson_clk_cpu_ops,
> -		.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "sys_pll" },
> -		.num_parents = 1,
> -	},
> -};
> ?
> ?static u32 mux_table_clk81[]	= { 6, 5, 7 };
> ?
> @@ -1045,7 +1020,6 @@ static MESON_GATE(gxbb_ao_i2c, HHI_GCLK_AO, 4);
> ?static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data = {
> ?	.hws = {
> ?		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		????= &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		????= &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	????= &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	????= &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	????= &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1165,7 +1139,6 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data =
> {
> ?static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxl_hw_onecell_data = {
> ?	.hws = {
> ?		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		????= &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		????= &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	????= &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	????= &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
> ?		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	????= &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1430,7 +1403,6 @@ struct clkc_data {
> ?	unsigned int clk_dividers_count;
> ?	struct meson_clk_audio_divider *const *clk_audio_dividers;
> ?	unsigned int clk_audio_dividers_count;
> -	struct meson_clk_cpu *cpu_clk;
> ?	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_onecell_data;
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1447,7 +1419,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxbb_clkc_data = {
> ?	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
> ?	.hw_onecell_data = &gxbb_hw_onecell_data,
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1464,7 +1435,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxl_clkc_data = {
> ?	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
> ?	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
> ?	.hw_onecell_data = &gxl_hw_onecell_data,
> ?};
> ?
> @@ -1479,8 +1449,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?	const struct clkc_data *clkc_data;
> ?	void __iomem *clk_base;
> ?	int ret, clkid, i;
> -	struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
> -	struct clk *parent_clk;
> ?	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> ?
> ?	clkc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1502,9 +1470,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_mplls_count; i++)
> ?		clkc_data->clk_mplls[i]->base = clk_base;
> ?
> -	/* Populate the base address for CPU clk */
> -	clkc_data->cpu_clk->base = clk_base;
> -
> ?	/* Populate base address for gates */
> ?	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_gates_count; i++)
> ?		clkc_data->clk_gates[i]->reg = clk_base +
> @@ -1538,29 +1503,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> ?			goto iounmap;
> ?	}
> ?
> -	/*
> -	?* Register CPU clk notifier
> -	?*
> -	?* FIXME this is wrong for a lot of reasons. First, the muxes should
> be
> -	?* struct clk_hw objects. Second, we shouldn't program the muxes in
> -	?* notifier handlers. The tricky programming sequence will be handled
> -	?* by the forthcoming coordinated clock rates mechanism once that
> -	?* feature is released.
> -	?*
> -	?* Furthermore, looking up the parent this way is terrible. At some
> -	?* point we will stop allocating a default struct clk when
> registering
> -	?* a new clk_hw, and this hack will no longer work. Releasing the ccr
> -	?* feature before that time solves the problem :-)
> -	?*/
> -	parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(&clkc_data->cpu_clk->hw);
> -	parent_clk = parent_hw->clk;
> -	ret = clk_notifier_register(parent_clk, &clkc_data->cpu_clk->clk_nb);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("%s: failed to register clock notifier for cpu_clk\n",
> -				__func__);
> -		goto iounmap;
> -	}
> -
> ?	return of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
> ?			clkc_data->hw_onecell_data);
> ?
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> index 17c6aef033ff..36330c2d4433 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
> ? * to be exposed to client nodes in DT: include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> ? */
> ?#define CLKID_SYS_PLL		??0
> -/* CLKID_CPUCLK */
> +/* ID 1 is unused (it was used by the non-existing CLKID_CPUCLK before) */
> ?/* CLKID_HDMI_PLL */
> ?#define CLKID_FIXED_PLL		??3
> ?/* CLKID_FCLK_DIV2 */
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h b/include/dt-
> bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> index 4516bc4253b5..54faf83a4851 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> ?#ifndef __GXBB_CLKC_H
> ?#define __GXBB_CLKC_H
> ?
> -#define CLKID_CPUCLK		1
> ?#define CLKID_HDMI_PLL		2
> ?#define CLKID_FCLK_DIV2		4
> ?#define CLKID_FCLK_DIV3		5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Martin Blumenstingl
	<martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-amlogic-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	carlo-KA+7E9HrN00dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Neil Armstrong
	<narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:57:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491148665.3480.8.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170401125519.7339-2-martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 14:55 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> It seems that the "cpu_clk" was carried over from the meson8b clock
> controller driver. On Meson GX (GXBB/GXL/GXM) the registers which are
> used by the cpu_clk have a different purpose (in other words: they don't
> control the CPU clock anymore). HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1 bits 31:24 are
> reserved according to the public S905 datasheet, while bit 23 is the
> "A53_trace_clk_DIS" gate (which according to the datasheet should only
> be used in case a silicon bug is discovered) and bits 22:20 are a
> divider (A53_trace_clk). The meson clk-cpu code however expects that
> bits 28:20 are reserved for a divider (according to the public S805
> datasheet this "SCALE_DIV: This value represents an N+1 divider of the
> input clock.").
> 
> The CPU clock on Meson GX SoCs is provided by the SCPI DVFS clock
> driver instead. Two examples from a Meson GXL S905X SoC:
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1000000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> - vcpu (SCPI DVFS clock 0) rate: 1512000000 / cpu_clk rate: 708000000
> 
> Unfortunately the CLKID_CPUCLK was already exported (but is currently
> not used) to DT. Due to the removal of this clock definition there is
> now a hole in the clk_hw_onecell_data (which is not a problem because
> this case is already handled in gxbb_clkc_probe).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

Looks good to me.
I'll wait for the Ack of one of the DT maintainers to apply it.
Thx Martin

Cheers

> ---
>  drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c              | 64 ++------------------------------
> ---
>  drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h              |  2 +-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> index ad5f027af1a2..7cf88ca9bdce 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c
> @@ -278,20 +278,6 @@ static const struct pll_rate_table
> gxl_gp0_pll_rate_table[] = {
>  	{ /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  
> -static const struct clk_div_table cpu_div_table[] = {
> -	{ .val = 1, .div = 1 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 2 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 3 },
> -	{ .val = 2, .div = 4 },
> -	{ .val = 3, .div = 6 },
> -	{ .val = 4, .div = 8 },
> -	{ .val = 5, .div = 10 },
> -	{ .val = 6, .div = 12 },
> -	{ .val = 7, .div = 14 },
> -	{ .val = 8, .div = 16 },
> -	{ /* sentinel */ },
> -};
> -
>  static struct meson_clk_pll gxbb_fixed_pll = {
>  	.m = {
>  		.reg_off = HHI_MPLL_CNTL,
> @@ -612,21 +598,10 @@ static struct meson_clk_mpll gxbb_mpll2 = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * FIXME cpu clocks and the legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL
> - * post-dividers and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the
> - * forthcoming coordinated clock rates feature
> + * FIXME The legacy composite clocks (e.g. clk81) are both PLL post-dividers
> + * and should be modeled with their respective PLLs via the forthcoming
> + * coordinated clock rates feature
>   */
> -static struct meson_clk_cpu gxbb_cpu_clk = {
> -	.reg_off = HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1,
> -	.div_table = cpu_div_table,
> -	.clk_nb.notifier_call = meson_clk_cpu_notifier_cb,
> -	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> -		.name = "cpu_clk",
> -		.ops = &meson_clk_cpu_ops,
> -		.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "sys_pll" },
> -		.num_parents = 1,
> -	},
> -};
>  
>  static u32 mux_table_clk81[]	= { 6, 5, 7 };
>  
> @@ -1045,7 +1020,6 @@ static MESON_GATE(gxbb_ao_i2c, HHI_GCLK_AO, 4);
>  static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data = {
>  	.hws = {
>  		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		    = &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		    = &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
>  		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	    = &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	    = &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	    = &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1165,7 +1139,6 @@ static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxbb_hw_onecell_data =
> {
>  static struct clk_hw_onecell_data gxl_hw_onecell_data = {
>  	.hws = {
>  		[CLKID_SYS_PLL]		    = &gxbb_sys_pll.hw,
> -		[CLKID_CPUCLK]		    = &gxbb_cpu_clk.hw,
>  		[CLKID_HDMI_PLL]	    = &gxbb_hdmi_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FIXED_PLL]	    = &gxbb_fixed_pll.hw,
>  		[CLKID_FCLK_DIV2]	    = &gxbb_fclk_div2.hw,
> @@ -1430,7 +1403,6 @@ struct clkc_data {
>  	unsigned int clk_dividers_count;
>  	struct meson_clk_audio_divider *const *clk_audio_dividers;
>  	unsigned int clk_audio_dividers_count;
> -	struct meson_clk_cpu *cpu_clk;
>  	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_onecell_data;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1447,7 +1419,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxbb_clkc_data = {
>  	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
>  	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
>  	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
>  	.hw_onecell_data = &gxbb_hw_onecell_data,
>  };
>  
> @@ -1464,7 +1435,6 @@ static const struct clkc_data gxl_clkc_data = {
>  	.clk_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_clk_dividers),
>  	.clk_audio_dividers = gxbb_audio_dividers,
>  	.clk_audio_dividers_count = ARRAY_SIZE(gxbb_audio_dividers),
> -	.cpu_clk = &gxbb_cpu_clk,
>  	.hw_onecell_data = &gxl_hw_onecell_data,
>  };
>  
> @@ -1479,8 +1449,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct clkc_data *clkc_data;
>  	void __iomem *clk_base;
>  	int ret, clkid, i;
> -	struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
> -	struct clk *parent_clk;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  
>  	clkc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1502,9 +1470,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_mplls_count; i++)
>  		clkc_data->clk_mplls[i]->base = clk_base;
>  
> -	/* Populate the base address for CPU clk */
> -	clkc_data->cpu_clk->base = clk_base;
> -
>  	/* Populate base address for gates */
>  	for (i = 0; i < clkc_data->clk_gates_count; i++)
>  		clkc_data->clk_gates[i]->reg = clk_base +
> @@ -1538,29 +1503,6 @@ static int gxbb_clkc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  			goto iounmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Register CPU clk notifier
> -	 *
> -	 * FIXME this is wrong for a lot of reasons. First, the muxes should
> be
> -	 * struct clk_hw objects. Second, we shouldn't program the muxes in
> -	 * notifier handlers. The tricky programming sequence will be handled
> -	 * by the forthcoming coordinated clock rates mechanism once that
> -	 * feature is released.
> -	 *
> -	 * Furthermore, looking up the parent this way is terrible. At some
> -	 * point we will stop allocating a default struct clk when
> registering
> -	 * a new clk_hw, and this hack will no longer work. Releasing the ccr
> -	 * feature before that time solves the problem :-)
> -	 */
> -	parent_hw = clk_hw_get_parent(&clkc_data->cpu_clk->hw);
> -	parent_clk = parent_hw->clk;
> -	ret = clk_notifier_register(parent_clk, &clkc_data->cpu_clk->clk_nb);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("%s: failed to register clock notifier for cpu_clk\n",
> -				__func__);
> -		goto iounmap;
> -	}
> -
>  	return of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>  			clkc_data->hw_onecell_data);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> index 17c6aef033ff..36330c2d4433 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
>   * to be exposed to client nodes in DT: include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
>   */
>  #define CLKID_SYS_PLL		  0
> -/* CLKID_CPUCLK */
> +/* ID 1 is unused (it was used by the non-existing CLKID_CPUCLK before) */
>  /* CLKID_HDMI_PLL */
>  #define CLKID_FIXED_PLL		  3
>  /* CLKID_FCLK_DIV2 */
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h b/include/dt-
> bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> index 4516bc4253b5..54faf83a4851 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
>  #ifndef __GXBB_CLKC_H
>  #define __GXBB_CLKC_H
>  
> -#define CLKID_CPUCLK		1
>  #define CLKID_HDMI_PLL		2
>  #define CLKID_FCLK_DIV2		4
>  #define CLKID_FCLK_DIV3		5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-02 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-01 12:55 [PATCH 0/1] remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB/GXL/GXM driver Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-01 12:55 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-01 12:55 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-01 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-01 12:55   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-01 12:55   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-04-02 15:57   ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2017-04-02 15:57     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-04-02 15:57     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-04-02 15:57     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-04 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB/GXL/GXM driver Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: meson-gxbb: un-export the CPU clock Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-15 15:54     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-15 15:54       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-15 15:54       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-04 18:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: meson: gxbb: remove the "cpu_clk" from the GXBB and GXL driver Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-04 18:19     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-05-15 15:56     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-15 15:56       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-15 15:56       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-15 15:56       ` Jerome Brunet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491148665.3480.8.camel@baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.