All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm: clear region badblock in nvdimm_clear_poison()
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:05:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493651145.30303.13.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4jQGiDEW6QJYi3EeF5f0UkC=FEx4uA-K+_RaEN-JpZGEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 17:35 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.c
> om> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel
> > .com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Badblocks are tracked at both region and device levels.
> > > > pmem_clear_poison() and nsio_rw_bytes() call
> > > > nvdimm_clear_poison() and then badblocks_clear() to clear
> > > > badblocks at the device level. However, it does not update
> > > > badblocks at the region level, which makes them inconsistent.
> > > > 
> > > > Change nvdimm_clear_poison() to update backblocks at the region
> > > > level to keep them consistent.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> > > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > This looks good, and it seems we have a bug in the other location
> > > that does this in __nd_ioctl(). That other one is missing the
> > > "clear_err.cleared / 512" check. Can you respin this and define a
> > > common helper that both locations can call?
> > 
> > On second thought, I'll take this and spin my own cleanup / fix on
> > top.
> > 
> > Thanks Toshi!
> 
> ...and I need to drop it again because it causes this:
> 
> [  106.974889] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> [  106.977328] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 5584, name:
> dd

Sorry, I should have tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP set.  Thanks
for straighten it out in your patch! 

-Toshi 
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm: clear region badblock in nvdimm_clear_poison()
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:05:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493651145.30303.13.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4jQGiDEW6QJYi3EeF5f0UkC=FEx4uA-K+_RaEN-JpZGEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 17:35 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.c
> om> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel
> > .com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Badblocks are tracked at both region and device levels.
> > > > pmem_clear_poison() and nsio_rw_bytes() call
> > > > nvdimm_clear_poison() and then badblocks_clear() to clear
> > > > badblocks at the device level. However, it does not update
> > > > badblocks at the region level, which makes them inconsistent.
> > > > 
> > > > Change nvdimm_clear_poison() to update backblocks at the region
> > > > level to keep them consistent.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> > > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > This looks good, and it seems we have a bug in the other location
> > > that does this in __nd_ioctl(). That other one is missing the
> > > "clear_err.cleared / 512" check. Can you respin this and define a
> > > common helper that both locations can call?
> > 
> > On second thought, I'll take this and spin my own cleanup / fix on
> > top.
> > 
> > Thanks Toshi!
> 
> ...and I need to drop it again because it causes this:
> 
> [  106.974889] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> [  106.977328] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 5584, name:
> dd

Sorry, I should have tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP set.  Thanks
for straighten it out in your patch! 

-Toshi 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-01 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27 22:57 [PATCH 1/2] libnvdimm: fix clear length of nvdimm_forget_poison() Toshi Kani
2017-04-27 22:57 ` Toshi Kani
2017-04-27 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm: clear region badblock in nvdimm_clear_poison() Toshi Kani
2017-04-27 22:57   ` Toshi Kani
2017-04-29  0:10   ` Dan Williams
2017-04-29  0:10     ` Dan Williams
2017-04-29  0:12     ` Dan Williams
2017-04-29  0:12       ` Dan Williams
2017-04-29  0:35       ` Dan Williams
2017-04-29  0:35         ` Dan Williams
2017-05-01 15:05         ` Kani, Toshimitsu [this message]
2017-05-01 15:05           ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-28 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] libnvdimm: fix clear length of nvdimm_forget_poison() Dan Williams
2017-04-28 21:48   ` Dan Williams
2017-04-28 22:29   ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-28 22:29     ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-28 22:39     ` Dan Williams
2017-04-28 22:39       ` Dan Williams
2017-04-28 22:41       ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-28 22:41         ` Kani, Toshimitsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1493651145.30303.13.camel@hpe.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.