Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping]

[Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>]

On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
>=20
> commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
> Author: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
> Date:   Thu Jun 1 23:00:21 2017 +0200
>=20
>     perf report: Include partial stacks unwound with libdw
>    =20
>     So far the whole stack was thrown away when any error occurred before
>     the maximum stack depth was unwound. This is actually a very common
>     scenario though. The stacks that got unwound so far are still
>     interesting. This removes a large chunk of differences when comparing
>     perf script output for libunwind and libdw perf unwinding.
>=20
> If not, then this could explain the issue you are seeing.

Thanks! No, I didn't have that patch (*) yet. It makes a huge
difference. With that, Paolo's patch and the elfutils libdw powerpc64
fallback unwinder patch, it looks like I get user stack traces for
everything now on ppc64le.

Cheers,

Mark

(*) It just this one-liner, but what a difference that makes:

--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int unwind__get_entries(unwind_entry_cb_t cb, void *arg=
,
=20
        err =3D dwfl_getthread_frames(ui->dwfl, thread->tid, frame_callback=
, ui);
=20
-       if (err && !ui->max_stack)
+       if (err && ui->max_stack !=3D max_stack)
                err =3D 0;
=20
        /*