All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Cawa Cheng <cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Mao Huang <littlecvr@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v2] drm: mediatek: change the variable type of rdma threshold
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:25:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498098321.717.17.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621211456.GA21176@roeck-us.net>

Hi, Guenter,

Thanks for your test and comment.


On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:57:23PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > For some greater resolution, the rdma threshold
> > variable will overflow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > index 0df05f9..9afdcd7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >  #define DISP_REG_RDMA_FIFO_CON			0x0040
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_UNDERFLOW_EN				BIT(31)
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(bytes)			(((bytes) / 16) << 16)
> > -#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes)		((bytes) / 16)
> > +#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes) (((bytes) / 16) & 0x3ff)
> 
> I agree with the earlier comment; clamp_val() might be more appropriate here
> and would avoid unexpected results.
> 

Yep, It's a good suggestion to me, I will add clamp_val() to avoid
unexpected value, thanks.

> >  
> >  /**
> >   * struct mtk_disp_rdma - DISP_RDMA driver structure
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  			    unsigned int height, unsigned int vrefresh,
> >  			    unsigned int bpc)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int threshold;
> > +	unsigned long long threshold;
> >  	unsigned int reg;
> >  
> >  	rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_0, 0xfff, width);
> > @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  	 * output threshold to 6 microseconds with 7/6 overhead to
> >  	 * account for blanking, and with a pixel depth of 4 bytes:
> >  	 */
> > -	threshold = width * height * vrefresh * 4 * 7 / 1000000;
> > +	threshold = (unsigned long long)width * height * vrefresh *
> > +		    4 * 7 / 1000000;
> 
> This is a 64 bit divide operation. It will result in a build failure
> if compiled for a 32 bit kernel (eg arm:allmodconfig).
> 
> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!
> 

Sorry about the lack of tests, I will change the divide operation to
div_u64 function, thanks for your suggestions.


> Guenter

-- 
Bibby

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com (Bibby Hsieh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [v2] drm: mediatek: change the variable type of rdma threshold
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:25:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498098321.717.17.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621211456.GA21176@roeck-us.net>

Hi, Guenter,

Thanks for your test and comment.


On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:57:23PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > For some greater resolution, the rdma threshold
> > variable will overflow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > index 0df05f9..9afdcd7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >  #define DISP_REG_RDMA_FIFO_CON			0x0040
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_UNDERFLOW_EN				BIT(31)
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(bytes)			(((bytes) / 16) << 16)
> > -#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes)		((bytes) / 16)
> > +#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes) (((bytes) / 16) & 0x3ff)
> 
> I agree with the earlier comment; clamp_val() might be more appropriate here
> and would avoid unexpected results.
> 

Yep, It's a good suggestion to me, I will add clamp_val() to avoid
unexpected value, thanks.

> >  
> >  /**
> >   * struct mtk_disp_rdma - DISP_RDMA driver structure
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  			    unsigned int height, unsigned int vrefresh,
> >  			    unsigned int bpc)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int threshold;
> > +	unsigned long long threshold;
> >  	unsigned int reg;
> >  
> >  	rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_0, 0xfff, width);
> > @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  	 * output threshold to 6 microseconds with 7/6 overhead to
> >  	 * account for blanking, and with a pixel depth of 4 bytes:
> >  	 */
> > -	threshold = width * height * vrefresh * 4 * 7 / 1000000;
> > +	threshold = (unsigned long long)width * height * vrefresh *
> > +		    4 * 7 / 1000000;
> 
> This is a 64 bit divide operation. It will result in a build failure
> if compiled for a 32 bit kernel (eg arm:allmodconfig).
> 
> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!
> 

Sorry about the lack of tests, I will change the divide operation to
div_u64 function, thanks for your suggestions.


> Guenter

-- 
Bibby

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cawa Cheng <cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	"Mao Huang" <littlecvr@chromium.org>, CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] drm: mediatek: change the variable type of rdma threshold
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:25:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498098321.717.17.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621211456.GA21176@roeck-us.net>

Hi, Guenter,

Thanks for your test and comment.


On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:57:23PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > For some greater resolution, the rdma threshold
> > variable will overflow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > index 0df05f9..9afdcd7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >  #define DISP_REG_RDMA_FIFO_CON			0x0040
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_UNDERFLOW_EN				BIT(31)
> >  #define RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(bytes)			(((bytes) / 16) << 16)
> > -#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes)		((bytes) / 16)
> > +#define RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(bytes) (((bytes) / 16) & 0x3ff)
> 
> I agree with the earlier comment; clamp_val() might be more appropriate here
> and would avoid unexpected results.
> 

Yep, It's a good suggestion to me, I will add clamp_val() to avoid
unexpected value, thanks.

> >  
> >  /**
> >   * struct mtk_disp_rdma - DISP_RDMA driver structure
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  			    unsigned int height, unsigned int vrefresh,
> >  			    unsigned int bpc)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int threshold;
> > +	unsigned long long threshold;
> >  	unsigned int reg;
> >  
> >  	rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_0, 0xfff, width);
> > @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  	 * output threshold to 6 microseconds with 7/6 overhead to
> >  	 * account for blanking, and with a pixel depth of 4 bytes:
> >  	 */
> > -	threshold = width * height * vrefresh * 4 * 7 / 1000000;
> > +	threshold = (unsigned long long)width * height * vrefresh *
> > +		    4 * 7 / 1000000;
> 
> This is a 64 bit divide operation. It will result in a build failure
> if compiled for a 32 bit kernel (eg arm:allmodconfig).
> 
> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!
> 

Sorry about the lack of tests, I will change the divide operation to
div_u64 function, thanks for your suggestions.


> Guenter

-- 
Bibby

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-22  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-19  9:57 [PATCH v2] drm: mediatek: change the variable type of rdma threshold Bibby Hsieh
2017-05-19  9:57 ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-05-19  9:57 ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-05-22  5:46 ` CK Hu
2017-05-22  5:46   ` CK Hu
2017-05-22  5:46   ` CK Hu
2017-06-22  2:21   ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-06-22  2:21     ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-06-22  2:21     ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-06-21 21:14 ` [v2] " Guenter Roeck
2017-06-21 21:14   ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-22  2:25   ` Bibby Hsieh [this message]
2017-06-22  2:25     ` Bibby Hsieh
2017-06-22  2:25     ` Bibby Hsieh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1498098321.717.17.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=cawa.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=littlecvr@chromium.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.