From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:28:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500377308.1351.5.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760eqb3fr.fsf@intel.com>
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:38 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.
> com> wrote:
> > This adds the connector name when printing a debug message about the
> > DP
> > link training result. It is useful to figure out what connector is
> > failing when multiple DP connectors are used.
>
> Perhaps more consistent would be using a prefix like this:
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] bla bla blaa\n",
> connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name);
You are definitely right, this is what is used all over the place in the
driver, so I should stick to it.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will send out v2 in that direction shortly.
Cheers,
Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > index b79c1c0e404c..75a411c94ce5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > @@ -321,13 +321,15 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
> > goto failure_handling;
> >
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane
> > count = %d",
> > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane
> > count = %d for connector %s",
> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count,
> > + intel_connector->base.name);
> > return;
> >
> > failure_handling:
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane
> > count = %d",
> > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane
> > count = %d for connector %s",
> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count,
> > + intel_connector->base.name);
> > if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > intel_dp-
> > >link_rate,
> > intel_dp-
> > >lane_count))
>
>
--
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo, Finland
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:28:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500377308.1351.5.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760eqb3fr.fsf@intel.com>
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:38 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.
> com> wrote:
> > This adds the connector name when printing a debug message about the
> > DP
> > link training result. It is useful to figure out what connector is
> > failing when multiple DP connectors are used.
>
> Perhaps more consistent would be using a prefix like this:
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] bla bla blaa\n",
> connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name);
You are definitely right, this is what is used all over the place in the
driver, so I should stick to it.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will send out v2 in that direction shortly.
Cheers,
Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > index b79c1c0e404c..75a411c94ce5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > @@ -321,13 +321,15 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
> > goto failure_handling;
> >
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane
> > count = %d",
> > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane
> > count = %d for connector %s",
> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count,
> > + intel_connector->base.name);
> > return;
> >
> > failure_handling:
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane
> > count = %d",
> > - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane
> > count = %d for connector %s",
> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count,
> > + intel_connector->base.name);
> > if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > intel_dp-
> > >link_rate,
> > intel_dp-
> > >lane_count))
>
>
--
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo, Finland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 14:27 [PATCH] drm/i915: Explicit the connector name for DP link training result Paul Kocialkowski
2017-07-17 14:27 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2017-07-17 14:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-07-18 7:38 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2017-07-18 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
2017-07-18 11:28 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2017-07-18 11:28 ` Paul Kocialkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500377308.1351.5.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=paul.kocialkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.