Bitbake failure:

Bitbake failure:

[pawanKumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

Hi team,
When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as
"target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato".
How to over come this error.

Regards
Pavan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 344 bytes --]

Re: Bitbake failure:

[Joshua Watt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]

On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
> Hi team,When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error
> as
> "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". 
> How to over come this error.

I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:
bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato
> Regards
> Pavan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 842 bytes --]

Re: Bitbake failure:

[pawanKumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 514 bytes --]

Thanks for your tip.
Can I use capital c in place of small c.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as
> "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato".
> How to over come this error.
>
>
> I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:
>
> bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato
>
>
> Regards
> Pavan.
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1216 bytes --]

Re: Bitbake failure:

[Joshua Watt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
> Thanks for your tip.Can I use capital c in place of small c.

Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do:
 bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato
that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way
to do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, although TBH I'm
not sure if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps someone more
familiar with the recursive dependencies can chime in. 
However, I recently ran into a case where having -f apply to --runall
was useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add support for it.
If that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use case is? I
haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sure if my
use is actually valid.
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
> > > Hi team,When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving
> > > error as
> > > "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". 
> > > How to over come this error.
> > 
> > I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:
> > bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato
> > > Regards
> > > Pavan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2324 bytes --]

Re: Bitbake failure:

[pawanKumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1512 bytes --]

Thanks, I'll look into it.
For yocto-2.5 M3 rc1 they have given as
bitbake -c fetchall core-image-sato
That means it is a failure.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 7:52 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
>
> Thanks for your tip.
> Can I use capital c in place of small c.
>
>
> Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do:
>
> bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato
>
> that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way to
> do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, although TBH I'm not sure
> if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps someone more familiar
> with the recursive dependencies can chime in.
>
> However, I recently ran into a case where having -f apply to --runall was
> useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add support for it. If
> that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use case is? I
> haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sure if my use
> is actually valid.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as
> "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato".
> How to over come this error.
>
>
> I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:
>
> bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato
>
>
> Regards
> Pavan.
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2893 bytes --]