All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default readX()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:08:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523938133-3224-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523938133-3224-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

parisc architecture seems to be mapping readX() and readX_relaxed() APIs
to __raw_readX() API.

__raw_readX() API doesn't provide any kind of ordering guarantees.
commit 032d59e1cde9 ("io: define stronger ordering for the default readX()
implementation") changed asm-generic implementation to use a more
conservative approach towards the readX() API.

Place a barrier() after the register read so that compiler doesn't
optimize across the regiter operation.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
index 2ec6405..e04c4ef 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
@@ -179,19 +179,34 @@ static inline void __raw_writeq(unsigned long long b, volatile void __iomem *add
 
 static inline unsigned char readb(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return __raw_readb(addr);
+	unsigned char ret;
+
+	ret = __raw_readb(addr);
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned short readw(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force) __raw_readw(addr));
+	unsigned short ret;
+
+	ret = le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force) __raw_readw(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned int readl(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force) __raw_readl(addr));
+	unsigned int ret;
+	ret = le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force) __raw_readl(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned long long readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le64_to_cpu((__le64 __force) __raw_readq(addr));
+	unsigned long long ret;
+
+	ret = le64_to_cpu((__le64 __force) __raw_readq(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline void writeb(unsigned char b, volatile void __iomem *addr)
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default readX()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:08:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523938133-3224-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523938133-3224-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

parisc architecture seems to be mapping readX() and readX_relaxed() APIs
to __raw_readX() API.

__raw_readX() API doesn't provide any kind of ordering guarantees.
commit 032d59e1cde9 ("io: define stronger ordering for the default readX()
implementation") changed asm-generic implementation to use a more
conservative approach towards the readX() API.

Place a barrier() after the register read so that compiler doesn't
optimize across the regiter operation.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
index 2ec6405..e04c4ef 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/io.h
@@ -179,19 +179,34 @@ static inline void __raw_writeq(unsigned long long b, volatile void __iomem *add
 
 static inline unsigned char readb(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return __raw_readb(addr);
+	unsigned char ret;
+
+	ret = __raw_readb(addr);
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned short readw(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force) __raw_readw(addr));
+	unsigned short ret;
+
+	ret = le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force) __raw_readw(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned int readl(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force) __raw_readl(addr));
+	unsigned int ret;
+	ret = le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force) __raw_readl(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 static inline unsigned long long readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 {
-	return le64_to_cpu((__le64 __force) __raw_readq(addr));
+	unsigned long long ret;
+
+	ret = le64_to_cpu((__le64 __force) __raw_readq(addr));
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline void writeb(unsigned char b, volatile void __iomem *addr)
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-17  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-17  4:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default writeX() Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17  4:08 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17  4:08 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-04-17  4:08   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default readX() Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17  9:37   ` James Bottomley
2018-04-17  9:37     ` James Bottomley
2018-04-17 14:13     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17 14:13       ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17 15:55       ` James Bottomley
2018-04-17 15:55         ` James Bottomley
2018-04-17 18:28         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17 18:28           ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-17 22:53           ` John David Anglin
2018-04-17 22:53             ` John David Anglin
2018-04-18 13:39             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-18 13:39               ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1523938133-3224-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=sulrich@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.