From: toshi.kani@hpe.com (Kani, Toshi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: implement free pmd/pte page interfaces
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:30:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524781764.2693.503.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426200737.GS15462@8bytes.org>
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 22:07 +0200, joro at 8bytes.org wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:49:58PM +0000, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 19:23 +0200, joro at 8bytes.org wrote:
> > > So the PMD entry you clear can still be in a page-walk cache and this
> > > needs to be flushed too before you can free the PTE page. Otherwise
> > > page-walks might still go to the page you just freed. That is especially
> > > bad when the page is already reallocated and filled with other data.
> >
> > I do not understand why we need to flush processor caches here. x86
> > processor caches are coherent with MESI. So, clearing an PMD entry
> > modifies a cache entry on the processor associated with the address,
> > which in turn invalidates all stale cache entries on other processors.
>
> A page walk cache is not about the processors data cache, its a cache
> similar to the TLB to speed up page-walks by caching intermediate
> results of previous page walks.
Thanks for the clarification. After reading through SDM one more time, I
agree that we need a TLB purge here. Here is my current understanding.
- INVLPG purges both TLB and paging-structure caches. So, PMD cache was
purged once.
- However, processor may cache this PMD entry later in speculation
since it has p-bit set. (This is where my misunderstanding was.
Speculation is not allowed to access a target address, but it may still
cache this PMD entry.)
- A single INVLPG on each processor purges this PMD cache. It does not
need a range purge (which was already done).
Does it sound right to you?
As for the BUG_ON issue, are you able to reproduce this issue? If so,
would you be able to test the fix?
Regards,
-Toshi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"guohanjun@huawei.com" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
"wxf.wang@hisilicon.com" <wxf.wang@hisilicon.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Hocko, Michal" <MHocko@suse.com>,
"cpandya@codeaurora.org" <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: implement free pmd/pte page interfaces
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:30:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524781764.2693.503.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426200737.GS15462@8bytes.org>
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 22:07 +0200, joro@8bytes.org wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:49:58PM +0000, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 19:23 +0200, joro@8bytes.org wrote:
> > > So the PMD entry you clear can still be in a page-walk cache and this
> > > needs to be flushed too before you can free the PTE page. Otherwise
> > > page-walks might still go to the page you just freed. That is especially
> > > bad when the page is already reallocated and filled with other data.
> >
> > I do not understand why we need to flush processor caches here. x86
> > processor caches are coherent with MESI. So, clearing an PMD entry
> > modifies a cache entry on the processor associated with the address,
> > which in turn invalidates all stale cache entries on other processors.
>
> A page walk cache is not about the processors data cache, its a cache
> similar to the TLB to speed up page-walks by caching intermediate
> results of previous page walks.
Thanks for the clarification. After reading through SDM one more time, I
agree that we need a TLB purge here. Here is my current understanding.
- INVLPG purges both TLB and paging-structure caches. So, PMD cache was
purged once.
- However, processor may cache this PMD entry later in speculation
since it has p-bit set. (This is where my misunderstanding was.
Speculation is not allowed to access a target address, but it may still
cache this PMD entry.)
- A single INVLPG on each processor purges this PMD cache. It does not
need a range purge (which was already done).
Does it sound right to you?
As for the BUG_ON issue, are you able to reproduce this issue? If so,
would you be able to test the fix?
Regards,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 18:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] fix memory leak / panic in ioremap huge pages Toshi Kani
2018-03-14 18:01 ` Toshi Kani
2018-03-14 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmalloc: Add interfaces to free unmapped page table Toshi Kani
2018-03-14 18:01 ` Toshi Kani
2018-03-14 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-14 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-15 14:27 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-15 14:27 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-14 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: implement free pmd/pte page interfaces Toshi Kani
2018-03-14 18:01 ` Toshi Kani
2018-03-15 7:39 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-15 7:39 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-15 14:51 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-15 14:51 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-26 14:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-04-26 14:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-04-26 16:21 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-26 16:21 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-26 17:23 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-26 17:23 ` joro
2018-04-26 17:49 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-26 17:49 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-26 20:07 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-26 20:07 ` joro
2018-04-26 22:30 ` Kani, Toshi [this message]
2018-04-26 22:30 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-27 7:37 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-27 7:37 ` joro
2018-04-27 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-27 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-27 11:46 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-27 11:46 ` joro
2018-04-27 11:52 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-27 11:52 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-27 12:48 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-27 12:48 ` joro
2018-04-27 13:42 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-27 13:42 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-27 14:31 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-27 14:31 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-28 9:02 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2018-04-28 9:02 ` joro
2018-04-28 20:54 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-28 20:54 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-30 7:30 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-30 7:30 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-04-30 13:43 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-04-30 13:43 ` Kani, Toshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524781764.2693.503.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.