From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Okamoto Takayuki <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/27] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553017938-710-11-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553017938-710-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest
will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions.
In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order
to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register
fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example.
This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future
patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here.
For now, there is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 539feec..a5d14b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
{
u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
(u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
@@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (p->is_write)
return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
- p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+ p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
return true;
}
@@ -1107,16 +1108,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
* are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
* to be changed.
*/
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+ const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
}
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1128,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
return err;
/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+ if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
@@ -1137,25 +1140,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Okamoto Takayuki" <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Christoffer Dall" <cdall@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Zhang Lei" <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/27] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553017938-710-11-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553017938-710-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest
will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions.
In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order
to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register
fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example.
This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future
patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here.
For now, there is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 539feec..a5d14b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
{
u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
(u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
@@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (p->is_write)
return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
- p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+ p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
return true;
}
@@ -1107,16 +1108,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
* are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
* to be changed.
*/
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+ const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
}
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1128,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
return err;
/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+ if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
@@ -1137,25 +1140,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 17:51 [PATCH v5 00/26] KVM: arm64: SVE guest support Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/27] KVM: Documentation: Document arm64 core registers in detail Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/27] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/27] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/27] KVM: arm64: Add missing #includes to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/27] arm64/sve: Clarify role of the VQ map maintenance functions Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/27] arm64/sve: Check SVE virtualisability Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/27] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 09/27] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 10/27] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg() Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 11/27] KVM: arm64: Support runtime sysreg visibility filtering Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-02 2:49 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-02 2:49 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 12/27] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-26 13:58 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-26 13:58 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 13/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 8:15 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 8:15 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/27] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via ioctl interface Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 15/27] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/string.h> in guest.c Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 16/27] KVM: arm64: Factor out core register ID enumeration Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 8:46 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 8:46 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 17/27] KVM: arm64: Reject ioctl access to FPSIMD V-regs on SVE vcpus Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 8:46 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 8:46 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 18/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 9:23 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 9:23 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 19/27] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 9:47 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 9:47 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 10:33 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 10:33 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 15:21 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 15:21 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-28 12:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-28 12:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-28 14:29 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-28 14:29 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-28 16:48 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-28 16:48 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-28 16:59 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-28 16:59 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 20/27] arm64/sve: In-kernel vector length availability query interface Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 21/27] KVM: arm/arm64: Add hook for arch-specific KVM initialisation Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 10:07 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 10:07 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 10:41 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 10:41 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 15:23 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 15:23 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 22/27] KVM: arm/arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE ioctl Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 14:07 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 14:07 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 17:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 17:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 23/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Add pseudo-register for the guest's vector lengths Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 14:57 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 14:57 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 24/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Allow userspace to enable SVE for vcpus Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 15:15 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 15:15 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 25/27] KVM: arm64: Add a capability to advertise SVE support Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 15:16 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-27 15:16 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 26/27] KVM: Document errors for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and KVM_SET_ONE_REG Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` [PATCH v6 27/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Document KVM API extensions for SVE Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 00/26] KVM: arm64: SVE guest support Dave Martin
2019-03-19 17:58 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 5:51 ` Zhang, Lei
2019-03-27 5:51 ` Zhang, Lei
2019-03-20 12:30 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-20 12:30 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-25 16:32 ` Andrew Jones
2019-03-25 16:32 ` Andrew Jones
2019-03-25 16:38 ` Peter Maydell
2019-03-25 16:38 ` Peter Maydell
2019-03-25 16:49 ` Andrew Jones
2019-03-25 16:49 ` Andrew Jones
2019-03-26 11:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-03-26 11:28 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553017938-710-11-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@kernel.org \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.