All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
	Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@nebula.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
	George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>,
	Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>,
	Eric Ricther <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() generic
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 20:13:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572135202.4532.88.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a97301a-0e25-2718-bd81-d778cb58e1d3@linux.microsoft.com>

On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 10:32 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 
> On 10/25/2019 10:24 AM, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > 
> > On 10/24/19 10:20 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >> On 10/23/19 8:47 PM, Nayna Jain wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Nayna,
> >>
> >>> +void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size,
> >>> +                const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> >>> +                int pcr)
> >>>   {
> >>>       int ret = 0;
> >>>       struct ima_template_entry *entry = NULL;
> >>
> >>> +    if (func) {

Let's comment this line.  Perhaps something like /*Unnecessary for
auxiliary buffer measurements */
> >>> +        security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
> >>> +        action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), secid, 0, func,
> >>> +                    &pcr, &template);
> >>> +        if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE))
> >>> +            return;
> >>> +    }
> >>
> >> In your change set process_buffer_measurement is called with NONE for 
> >> the parameter func. So ima_get_action (the above if block) will not be 
> >> executed.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it better to update ima_get_action (and related functions) to 
> >> handle the ima policy (func param)?
> > 
> > 
> > The idea is to use ima-buf template for the auxiliary measurement 
> > record. The auxiliary measurement record is an additional record to the 
> > one already created based on the existing policy. When func is passed as 
> > NONE, it represents it is an additional record. I am not sure what you 
> > mean by updating ima_get_action, it is already handling the ima policy.
> >
> 
> I was referring to using "func" in process_buffer_measurement to 
> determine ima action. In my opinion, process_buffer_measurement should 
> be generic.
> 
> ima_get_action() should instead determine the required ima action, 
> template, pcr, etc. based on "func" passed to it.

Nayna's original patch moved ima_get_action() into the caller, but
that resulted in code duplication in each of the callers.  This
solution differentiates between the initial, which requires calling
ima_get_action(), and auxiliary buffer measurement records.

Mimi 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Eric Ricther <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
	Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@nebula.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
	Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() generic
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 20:13:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572135202.4532.88.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a97301a-0e25-2718-bd81-d778cb58e1d3@linux.microsoft.com>

On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 10:32 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 
> On 10/25/2019 10:24 AM, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > 
> > On 10/24/19 10:20 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >> On 10/23/19 8:47 PM, Nayna Jain wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Nayna,
> >>
> >>> +void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size,
> >>> +                const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
> >>> +                int pcr)
> >>>   {
> >>>       int ret = 0;
> >>>       struct ima_template_entry *entry = NULL;
> >>
> >>> +    if (func) {

Let's comment this line.  Perhaps something like /*Unnecessary for
auxiliary buffer measurements */
> >>> +        security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
> >>> +        action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), secid, 0, func,
> >>> +                    &pcr, &template);
> >>> +        if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE))
> >>> +            return;
> >>> +    }
> >>
> >> In your change set process_buffer_measurement is called with NONE for 
> >> the parameter func. So ima_get_action (the above if block) will not be 
> >> executed.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it better to update ima_get_action (and related functions) to 
> >> handle the ima policy (func param)?
> > 
> > 
> > The idea is to use ima-buf template for the auxiliary measurement 
> > record. The auxiliary measurement record is an additional record to the 
> > one already created based on the existing policy. When func is passed as 
> > NONE, it represents it is an additional record. I am not sure what you 
> > mean by updating ima_get_action, it is already handling the ima policy.
> >
> 
> I was referring to using "func" in process_buffer_measurement to 
> determine ima action. In my opinion, process_buffer_measurement should 
> be generic.
> 
> ima_get_action() should instead determine the required ima action, 
> template, pcr, etc. based on "func" passed to it.

Nayna's original patch moved ima_get_action() into the caller, but
that resulted in code duplication in each of the callers.  This
solution differentiates between the initial, which requires calling
ima_get_action(), and auxiliary buffer measurement records.

Mimi 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-27  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24  3:47 [PATCH v9 0/8] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] powerpc: detect the secure boot mode of the system Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:26   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 17:26     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 16:49     ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 16:49       ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] powerpc/ima: add support to initialize ima policy rules Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:35   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 17:35     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:02     ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 17:02       ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 18:03       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 18:03         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-28 23:42         ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-28 23:42           ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-26 23:52       ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-26 23:52         ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-28 11:54         ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-28 11:54           ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] powerpc: detect the trusted boot state of the system Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:38   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 17:38     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 16:50     ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 16:50       ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] powerpc/ima: define trusted boot policy Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:40   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 17:40     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() generic Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 15:20   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 15:20     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:24     ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 17:24       ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 17:32       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:32         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-27  0:13         ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-10-27  0:13           ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-30 15:22   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-30 15:22     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-30 16:35     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-30 16:35       ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] certs: add wrapper function to check blacklisted binary hash Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:48   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 17:48     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:36     ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 17:36       ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] powerpc/ima: update ima arch policy to check for blacklist Nayna Jain
2019-10-24  3:47   ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-28 12:10 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies Mimi Zohar
2019-10-28 12:10   ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1572135202.4532.88.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=erichte@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=erpalmer@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcwilson@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matthew.garret@nebula.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.