From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com
Cc: vfalico@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Boris.Shteinbock@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:57:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586.1450389436@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450339417-31254-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
<zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
>
>In 802.3ad mode, the speed and duplex is needed. But in some NIC,
>there is a time span between NIC up state and getting speed and duplex.
>As such, sometimes a slave in 802.3ad mode is in up state without
>speed and duplex. This will make bonding in 802.3ad mode can not
>work well.
>To make bonding driver be compatible with more NICs, it is
>necessary to restrict the up state in 802.3ad mode.
What device is this? It seems a bit odd that an Ethernet device
can be carrier up but not have the duplex and speed available.
Also, what are the option settings for bonding? Specifically,
is "use_carrier" set to 0? The default setting is 1.
In general, though, bonding expects a speed or duplex change to
be announced via a NETDEV_UPDATE or NETDEV_UP notifier, which would
propagate to the 802.3ad logic.
If the device here is going carrier up prior to having speed or
duplex available, then maybe it should call netdev_state_change() when
the duplex and speed are available, or delay calling netif_carrier_on().
>Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 9e0f8a7..0a80fb3 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -1991,6 +1991,25 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
>
> link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
>
>+ /* Since some NIC has time span between netif_running and
>+ * getting speed and duples. That is, after a NIC is up (netif_running),
>+ * there is a time span before this NIC is negotiated with speed and duplex.
>+ * During this time span, the slave in 802.3ad is configured without speed
>+ * and duplex. This 802.3ad bonding will not work because it needs slave's speed
>+ * and duplex to generate key field.
>+ * As such, we restrict up in 802.3ad mode to: netif_running && peed != SPEED_UNKNOWN &&
>+ * duplex != DUPLEX_UNKNOWN
>+ */
>+ if ((BMSR_LSTATUS == link_state) &&
>+ (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
>+ bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>+ if ((slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN) ||
>+ (slave->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN)) {
>+ link_state = 0;
>+ netdev_info(bond->dev, "In 802.3ad mode, it is not enough to up without speed and duplex");
>+ }
>+ }
Also, as a functional note on this patch, the above looks like
it will spam the log repeatedly every miimon interval for as long as the
"carrier up but no speed/duplex" situation persists.
-J
> switch (slave->link) {
> case BOND_LINK_UP:
> if (link_state)
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 8:03 [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zyjzyj2000
2015-12-17 21:57 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2015-12-18 4:36 ` zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:36 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: delay up state without speed and duplex " zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:54 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 13:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-12-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state " Michal Kubecek
2015-12-28 9:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-06 1:26 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-06 3:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 2:43 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 3:33 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 5:02 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 6:15 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-07 6:22 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 6:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-07 15:27 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 4:36 ` zhuyj
2016-01-08 6:12 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 7:41 ` (unknown), zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave link state changes zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 10:18 ` zhuyj
2016-01-09 1:35 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-09 2:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-11 9:03 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 2:54 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 17:03 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zyjzyj2000
2016-01-20 5:13 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-25 16:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-26 0:43 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 3:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 6:26 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:45 ` zhuyj
2016-01-27 20:00 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-28 8:44 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-29 7:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-25 16:33 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-25 18:00 ` David Miller
2016-01-25 18:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 2:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zhuyj
2016-01-07 6:53 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 7:37 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 8:35 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:47 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 18:28 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 6:09 ` zhuyj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-07 6:13 zyjzyj2000
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1586.1450389436@famine \
--to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=Boris.Shteinbock@windriver.com \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.