All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com,
	vfalico@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, boris.shteinbock@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:37:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <568E15B6.8010301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160107065340.GB27753@unicorn.suse.cz>

On 01/07/2016 02:53 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:15:13PM +0800, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
>>
>> In 802.3ad mode, the speed and duplex is needed. But in some NIC,
>> there is a time span between NIC up state and getting speed and duplex.
>> As such, sometimes a slave in 802.3ad mode is in up state without
>> speed and duplex. This will make bonding in 802.3ad mode can not
>> work well.
>> To make bonding driver be compatible with more NICs, it is
>> necessary to restrict the up state in 802.3ad mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |   11 +++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 09f8a48..7df8af5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -1991,6 +1991,17 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
>>   
>>   		link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
>>   
>> +		if ((BMSR_LSTATUS == link_state) &&
>> +		    (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
>> +			rtnl_lock();
>> +			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>> +			rtnl_unlock();
>> +			if ((slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN) ||
>> +			    (slave->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN)) {
>> +				link_state = 0;
>> +				netdev_info(bond->dev, "In 802.3ad mode, it is not enough to up without speed and duplex");
> If I read this right, whenever this state (link up but speed/duplex
> unknown) is entered, you'll keep writing this message into kernel log
> every miimon milliseconds until something changes. I'm not sure how long
> a NIC can stay in such state but it might get quite annoying (even more
> if something really goes wrong and NIC stays that way which can't be
> completely ruled out, IMHO).

Sure, Thanks a lot. I want to confirm link_up without link_speed. It is 
not usual. So I think this only lasts for several seconds.
It is very important to us since it can help us to find the root cause.

Zhu Yanjun

>
>
>> +			}
>> +		}
>>   		switch (slave->link) {
>>   		case BOND_LINK_UP:
>>   			if (link_state)
> BtW, you accidentally submitted this patch twice.
>
>                                                            Michal Kubecek

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-07  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-17  8:03 [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zyjzyj2000
2015-12-17 21:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18  4:36   ` zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18  4:36     ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: delay up state without speed and duplex " zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18  4:54       ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 13:37       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-12-28  8:43   ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state " Michal Kubecek
2015-12-28  9:19     ` zhuyj
2016-01-06  1:26       ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-06  3:05         ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  2:43           ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07  3:33             ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  5:02               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07  6:15                 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-07  6:22                   ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  6:33                   ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-07 15:27                     ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  1:28                     ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08  4:36                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-08  6:12                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08  7:41                           ` (unknown), zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08  7:41                             ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave link state changes zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 10:18                               ` zhuyj
2016-01-09  1:35                       ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-09  2:19                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-11  9:03                           ` zhuyj
2016-01-13  2:54                             ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 17:03                           ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-20  5:13                             ` [PATCH 1/1] " zyjzyj2000
2016-01-20  5:13                               ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16                             ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16                               ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-25 16:37                                 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-26  0:43                                 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26  3:19                                   ` zhuyj
2016-01-26  6:00                                     ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26  6:26                                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-26  6:45                                         ` zhuyj
2016-01-27 20:00                                       ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-28  8:44                                         ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-29  7:05                                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-25 16:33                               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-25 18:00                                 ` David Miller
2016-01-25 18:37                                   ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  2:29                     ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zhuyj
2016-01-07  6:53                   ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07  7:37                     ` zhuyj [this message]
2016-01-07  7:59                       ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07  8:35                         ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  7:47             ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 18:28               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  6:09                 ` zhuyj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-07  6:13 zyjzyj2000

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=568E15B6.8010301@gmail.com \
    --to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.shteinbock@windriver.com \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.