From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, mkubecek@suse.cz, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
Cc: vfalico@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, boris.shteinbock@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:22:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568E040A.5010604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452147313-22886-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
Hi, Emil
Would you like to help me to make tests with this patch?
If the root cause is not the time span, I will make a new patch for this.
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 01/07/2016 02:15 PM, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
>
> In 802.3ad mode, the speed and duplex is needed. But in some NIC,
> there is a time span between NIC up state and getting speed and duplex.
> As such, sometimes a slave in 802.3ad mode is in up state without
> speed and duplex. This will make bonding in 802.3ad mode can not
> work well.
> To make bonding driver be compatible with more NICs, it is
> necessary to restrict the up state in 802.3ad mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 09f8a48..7df8af5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1991,6 +1991,17 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
>
> link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
>
> + if ((BMSR_LSTATUS == link_state) &&
> + (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
> + rtnl_lock();
> + bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + if ((slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN) ||
> + (slave->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN)) {
> + link_state = 0;
> + netdev_info(bond->dev, "In 802.3ad mode, it is not enough to up without speed and duplex");
> + }
> + }
> switch (slave->link) {
> case BOND_LINK_UP:
> if (link_state)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 8:03 [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zyjzyj2000
2015-12-17 21:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 4:36 ` zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:36 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: delay up state without speed and duplex " zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:54 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 13:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-12-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state " Michal Kubecek
2015-12-28 9:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-06 1:26 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-06 3:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 2:43 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 3:33 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 5:02 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 6:15 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-07 6:22 ` zhuyj [this message]
2016-01-07 6:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-07 15:27 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 4:36 ` zhuyj
2016-01-08 6:12 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 7:41 ` (unknown), zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave link state changes zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 10:18 ` zhuyj
2016-01-09 1:35 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-09 2:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-11 9:03 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 2:54 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 17:03 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zyjzyj2000
2016-01-20 5:13 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-25 16:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-26 0:43 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 3:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 6:26 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:45 ` zhuyj
2016-01-27 20:00 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-28 8:44 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-29 7:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-25 16:33 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-25 18:00 ` David Miller
2016-01-25 18:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 2:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zhuyj
2016-01-07 6:53 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 7:37 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 8:35 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:47 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 18:28 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 6:09 ` zhuyj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-07 6:13 zyjzyj2000
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568E040A.5010604@gmail.com \
--to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.shteinbock@windriver.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.