From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
sgrubb@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: rgb@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:58:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592942295.5389.9.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618211012.2823-2-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 14:10 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> process_buffer_measurement() and ima_alloc_key_entry() functions need to
> log an audit message for auditing integrity measurement failures.
>
> Add audit message in these two functions. Remove "pr_devel" log message
> in process_buffer_measurement().
>
> Sample audit messages:
>
> [ 6.303048] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506281.627:2): pid=1 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=measuring_key
> cause=ENOMEM comm="swapper/0" name=".builtin_trusted_keys" res=0
> errno=-12
My only concern is that auditing -ENOMEM will put additional memory
pressure on the system. I'm not sure if this is a concern and, if so,
how it should be handled.
>
> [ 8.019432] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506283.344:10): pid=1
> uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
> subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 op=measuring_kexec_cmdline
> cause=hashing_error comm="systemd" name="kexec-cmdline" res=0
> errno=-22
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
sgrubb@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: rgb@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:58:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592942295.5389.9.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618211012.2823-2-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 14:10 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> process_buffer_measurement() and ima_alloc_key_entry() functions need to
> log an audit message for auditing integrity measurement failures.
>
> Add audit message in these two functions. Remove "pr_devel" log message
> in process_buffer_measurement().
>
> Sample audit messages:
>
> [ 6.303048] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506281.627:2): pid=1 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=measuring_key
> cause=ENOMEM comm="swapper/0" name=".builtin_trusted_keys" res=0
> errno=-12
My only concern is that auditing -ENOMEM will put additional memory
pressure on the system. I'm not sure if this is a concern and, if so,
how it should be handled.
>
> [ 8.019432] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506283.344:10): pid=1
> uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
> subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 op=measuring_kexec_cmdline
> cause=hashing_error comm="systemd" name="kexec-cmdline" res=0
> errno=-22
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 21:10 [PATCH v3 1/2] integrity: Add errno field in audit message Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-18 21:10 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-18 21:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-18 21:10 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-23 19:58 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-06-23 19:58 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-24 17:25 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-24 17:25 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-25 19:14 ` Paul Moore
2020-06-25 19:14 ` Paul Moore
2020-06-29 16:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-29 16:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-22 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] integrity: Add errno field in audit message Mimi Zohar
2020-06-22 22:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-24 0:07 ` Paul Moore
2020-06-24 0:07 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1592942295.5389.9.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.