From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594618.YnvvjhT6Oi@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611215147.199B13E0D8D@localhost>
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 22:51:47 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:55 +0100, Jonathan Austin
<jonathan.austin@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rob, Thomasz,
> >
> > (dredging up an oldish thread as I just ran in to this issue)
> >
> > On 01/04/13 22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On 03/09/2013 02:15 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > >> This patch moves several for_each macros out of the #ifdef
> > >> CONFIG_OF
> > >> block and adds inline stubs for functions used by these macros,
> > >> compiled conditionally when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
> > >>
> > >> This eliminates the need to explicitly check for CONFIG_OF in
> > >> driver
> > >> code using mentioned functions and macros.
> > >
> > > Do you have some users of this?
> >
Oops, it looks like I have missed Rob's reply.
I had eventually managed to get rid of code that needed this patch and
forgotten about it, but still this allowed me to track a problem with my
mail filtering...
Best regards,
Tomasz
> > I do!
> >
> > Or at least I might.
> >
> > I'm not certain as perhaps the fix to what I describe below is to add
> > dependencies on CONFIG_OF - it isn't clear to me either way:
> >
> > With both psci and arch_timers (CONFIG_ARM_PSCI,
> > CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
> > and without CONFIG_OF we get a build failure because we lack the
> > definition of of_find_matching_node():
> >
> > eg:
> > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c:167:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???of_find_matching_node??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > The same happens with arm_arch_timer.c (well, there's a patch required
> > to include linux/of.h first, after which Thomasz's patch is
> > relevant).
> That code path is completely broken if CONFIG_OF is not set. psci_init()
> is nothing but calls to CONFIG_OF infrastructure! I think that code
> needs to depend on CONFIG_OF, or at least be wrapped with
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))" if there are still usable parts when
> CONFIG_OF is disabled. Frankly I don't see that as being a real concern.
>
> That said, Arnd has posted a patch that moves at least some of the
> function prototypes out from under the #ifdef block so that GCC can do
> syntax checking on disabled code. That overlaps a bit with this patch.
>
> Regardless, I'm not going to apply it without a legitimate (as opposed
> to theoretical) user.
>
> g.
>
> > So, I guess the question is whether we should expect PSCI and
> > ARM_ARCH_TIMER to depend on CONFIG_OF, or whether we'd like them to
> > fail gracefully in the case that we *don't* have CONFIG_OF. I think
> > the current situation is broken either way...
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Jonny
> >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> include/linux/of.h | 92
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file
> > >> changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> > >> index a0f1292..7a736b8 100644
> > >> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> > >> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)> >>
> > >> static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
> > >> #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
> > >>
> > >> +#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
> > >> +#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
> > >> +#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible);
> > >> dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
> > >> +#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
> > >> +#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches,
> > >> match); \ + dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn,
> > >> matches, match)) +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> + for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL;
> > >> \
> > >> + child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
> > >> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> + for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child
> > >> != NULL; \ + child = of_get_next_available_child(parent,
> > >> child)) +#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > >>
> > >> /* Pointer for first entry in chain of all nodes. */
> > >>
> > >> @@ -167,19 +192,10 @@ static inline const char
> > >> *of_node_full_name(const struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *type);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *type, const char *compat);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible);
> > >> dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *from,
> > >> const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > >>
> > >> @@ -190,12 +206,6 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_matching_node(> >>
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> return of_find_matching_node_and_match(from, matches, NULL);
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
> > >> -#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches,
> > >> match); \ - dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn,
> > >> matches, match))> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char
> > >> *path);
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle
> > >> handle);
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node
> > >> *node);> >>
> > >> @@ -207,14 +217,6 @@ extern struct device_node
> > >> *of_get_next_available_child(> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct
> > >> device_node *node,> >>
> > >> const char *name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL;
> > >> \
> > >> - child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
> > >> -
> > >> -#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child
> > >> != NULL; \ - child = of_get_next_available_child(parent,
> > >> child)) -
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node
> > >> *np)
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *child;
> > >>
> > >> @@ -228,10 +230,6 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const
> > >> struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
> > >> -
> > >>
> > >> extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node
> > >> *np,
> > >>
> > >> const char *name,
> > >> int *lenp);
> > >>
> > >> @@ -353,13 +351,28 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,> >>
> > >> return NULL;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct
> > >> device_node *from, + const char *type)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> return false;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - while (0)
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct
> > >> device_node *node, +
> > >> struct device_node *prev) +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
> > >> + const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >>
> > >> static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> > >>
> > >> const struct device_node
> > >> *node,
> > >>
> > >> @@ -373,6 +386,12 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const
> > >> struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> return 0;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
> > >> + struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct
> > >> device_node *device,> >>
> > >> const char *name)
> > >>
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> @@ -394,6 +413,21 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_compatible_node(> >>
> > >> return NULL;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
> > >> + struct device_node *from,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id **match)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
> > >> + struct device_node *from,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct
> > >> device_node *np,> >>
> > >> const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t
> > >> sz)
> > >>
> > >> {
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1594618.YnvvjhT6Oi@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611215147.199B13E0D8D@localhost>
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 22:51:47 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:55 +0100, Jonathan Austin
<jonathan.austin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hi Rob, Thomasz,
> >
> > (dredging up an oldish thread as I just ran in to this issue)
> >
> > On 01/04/13 22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On 03/09/2013 02:15 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > >> This patch moves several for_each macros out of the #ifdef
> > >> CONFIG_OF
> > >> block and adds inline stubs for functions used by these macros,
> > >> compiled conditionally when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
> > >>
> > >> This eliminates the need to explicitly check for CONFIG_OF in
> > >> driver
> > >> code using mentioned functions and macros.
> > >
> > > Do you have some users of this?
> >
Oops, it looks like I have missed Rob's reply.
I had eventually managed to get rid of code that needed this patch and
forgotten about it, but still this allowed me to track a problem with my
mail filtering...
Best regards,
Tomasz
> > I do!
> >
> > Or at least I might.
> >
> > I'm not certain as perhaps the fix to what I describe below is to add
> > dependencies on CONFIG_OF - it isn't clear to me either way:
> >
> > With both psci and arch_timers (CONFIG_ARM_PSCI,
> > CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
> > and without CONFIG_OF we get a build failure because we lack the
> > definition of of_find_matching_node():
> >
> > eg:
> > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c:167:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> > âof_find_matching_nodeâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > The same happens with arm_arch_timer.c (well, there's a patch required
> > to include linux/of.h first, after which Thomasz's patch is
> > relevant).
> That code path is completely broken if CONFIG_OF is not set. psci_init()
> is nothing but calls to CONFIG_OF infrastructure! I think that code
> needs to depend on CONFIG_OF, or at least be wrapped with
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))" if there are still usable parts when
> CONFIG_OF is disabled. Frankly I don't see that as being a real concern.
>
> That said, Arnd has posted a patch that moves at least some of the
> function prototypes out from under the #ifdef block so that GCC can do
> syntax checking on disabled code. That overlaps a bit with this patch.
>
> Regardless, I'm not going to apply it without a legitimate (as opposed
> to theoretical) user.
>
> g.
>
> > So, I guess the question is whether we should expect PSCI and
> > ARM_ARCH_TIMER to depend on CONFIG_OF, or whether we'd like them to
> > fail gracefully in the case that we *don't* have CONFIG_OF. I think
> > the current situation is broken either way...
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Jonny
> >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> include/linux/of.h | 92
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file
> > >> changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> > >> index a0f1292..7a736b8 100644
> > >> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> > >> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)> >>
> > >> static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
> > >> #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
> > >>
> > >> +#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
> > >> +#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
> > >> +#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible);
> > >> dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
> > >> +#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
> > >> +#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches,
> > >> match); \ + dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn,
> > >> matches, match)) +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> + for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL;
> > >> \
> > >> + child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
> > >> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> + for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child
> > >> != NULL; \ + child = of_get_next_available_child(parent,
> > >> child)) +#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
> > >> + for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
> > >> + dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > >>
> > >> /* Pointer for first entry in chain of all nodes. */
> > >>
> > >> @@ -167,19 +192,10 @@ static inline const char
> > >> *of_node_full_name(const struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *type);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct
> > >> device_node *from,> >>
> > >> const char *type, const char *compat);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible);
> > >> dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
> > >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *from,
> > >> const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > >>
> > >> @@ -190,12 +206,6 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_matching_node(> >>
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> return of_find_matching_node_and_match(from, matches, NULL);
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
> > >> -#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches,
> > >> match); \ - dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn,
> > >> matches, match))> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char
> > >> *path);
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle
> > >> handle);
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node
> > >> *node);> >>
> > >> @@ -207,14 +217,6 @@ extern struct device_node
> > >> *of_get_next_available_child(> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct
> > >> device_node *node,> >>
> > >> const char *name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL;
> > >> \
> > >> - child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
> > >> -
> > >> -#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child
> > >> != NULL; \ - child = of_get_next_available_child(parent,
> > >> child)) -
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node
> > >> *np)
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *child;
> > >>
> > >> @@ -228,10 +230,6 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const
> > >> struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
> > >>
> > >> struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
> > >> - for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
> > >> - dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
> > >> -
> > >>
> > >> extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node
> > >> *np,
> > >>
> > >> const char *name,
> > >> int *lenp);
> > >>
> > >> @@ -353,13 +351,28 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,> >>
> > >> return NULL;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct
> > >> device_node *from, + const char *type)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> return false;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > >> - while (0)
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct
> > >> device_node *node, +
> > >> struct device_node *prev) +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
> > >> + const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >>
> > >> static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> > >>
> > >> const struct device_node
> > >> *node,
> > >>
> > >> @@ -373,6 +386,12 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const
> > >> struct device_node *np)> >>
> > >> return 0;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
> > >> + struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct
> > >> device_node *device,> >>
> > >> const char *name)
> > >>
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> @@ -394,6 +413,21 @@ static inline struct device_node
> > >> *of_find_compatible_node(> >>
> > >> return NULL;
> > >>
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
> > >> + struct device_node *from,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id **match)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
> > >> + struct device_node *from,
> > >> + const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >> static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct
> > >> device_node *np,> >>
> > >> const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t
> > >> sz)
> > >>
> > >> {
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-09 20:15 [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF Tomasz Figa
2013-03-09 20:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-01 21:19 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-01 21:19 ` Rob Herring
2013-06-11 16:22 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-06-11 16:22 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-06-11 21:51 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 21:51 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 22:35 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-11 22:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-12 10:10 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-06-12 10:10 ` Jonathan Austin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1594618.YnvvjhT6Oi@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.