All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jonathan.austin@arm.com (Jonathan Austin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:10:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B84929.4050802@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611215147.199B13E0D8D@localhost>

On 11/06/13 22:51, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:55 +0100, Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob, Thomasz,
>>
>> (dredging up an oldish thread as I just ran in to this issue)
>>
>> On 01/04/13 22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2013 02:15 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> This patch moves several for_each macros out of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>> block and adds inline stubs for functions used by these macros, compiled
>>>> conditionally when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
>>>>
>>>> This eliminates the need to explicitly check for CONFIG_OF in driver
>>>> code using mentioned functions and macros.
>>>
>>> Do you have some users of this?
>>
>> I do!
>>
>> Or at least I might.
>>
>> I'm not certain as perhaps the fix to what I describe below is to add
>> dependencies on CONFIG_OF - it isn't clear to me either way:
>>
>> With both psci and arch_timers (CONFIG_ARM_PSCI, CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
>> and without CONFIG_OF we get a build failure because we lack the definition
>> of of_find_matching_node():
>>
>> eg:
>> arch/arm/kernel/psci.c:167:2: error: implicit declaration of function ???of_find_matching_node??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> The same happens with arm_arch_timer.c (well, there's a patch required to
>> include linux/of.h first, after which Thomasz's patch is relevant).
>
> That code path is completely broken if CONFIG_OF is not set. psci_init()
> is nothing but calls to CONFIG_OF infrastructure! I think that code

Well, it looks like the intention of that code was to just behave like 
there was no relevant node in the case the CONFIG_OF was disabled:

	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
	if (!np)
		return 0;

If of_find_matching() node behaved like of_match_node() then nothing 
would be 'broken' per se, but we would have a bunch of useless code 
compiled in to our kernel.

> needs to depend on CONFIG_OF, or at least be wrapped with
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))" if there are still usable parts when
> CONFIG_OF is disabled. Frankly I don't see that as being a real concern.

Indeed, despite the clarification above, I think it'd be fine to not 
build these without CONFIG_OF.

I'm happy to submit a patches to add dependencies on CONFIG_OF for 
ARM_ARCH_TIMER and ARM_PSCI - I don't think either of those will get any 
complaints because as you say, neither makes very much sense without a 
DT to specify them.

Thanks,
Jonny

>
> That said, Arnd has posted a patch that moves at least some of the function
> prototypes out from under the #ifdef block so that GCC can do syntax
> checking on disabled code. That overlaps a bit with this patch.
>
> Regardless, I'm not going to apply it without a legitimate (as opposed
> to theoretical) user.
>
> g.
>
>> So, I guess the question is whether we should expect PSCI and ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>> to depend on CONFIG_OF, or whether we'd like them to fail gracefully in the
>> case that we *don't* have CONFIG_OF. I think the current situation is broken
>> either way...
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jonny
>>
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/linux/of.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>>>> index a0f1292..7a736b8 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)
>>>>    static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
>>>>    #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
>>>>
>>>> +#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>>>> +#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>>>> +#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>>>> +#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>>>> +#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>>>> +          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>>>> +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> +     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> +          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>>>> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> +     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> +          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>>>> +#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>>>> +
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>>
>>>>    /* Pointer for first entry in chain of all nodes. */
>>>> @@ -167,19 +192,10 @@ static inline const char *of_node_full_name(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *name);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *type);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *type, const char *compat);
>>>> -#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>>>>         struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>> @@ -190,12 +206,6 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>>>>    {
>>>>         return of_find_matching_node_and_match(from, matches, NULL);
>>>>    }
>>>> -#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>>>> -#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>>>> -          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path);
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle);
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node);
>>>> @@ -207,14 +217,6 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct device_node *node,
>>>>                                         const char *name);
>>>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> -          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>>>> -
>>>> -#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> -          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>>>> -
>>>>    static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>    {
>>>>         struct device_node *child;
>>>> @@ -228,10 +230,6 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>>>         struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>>>> -
>>>>    extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node *np,
>>>>                                          const char *name,
>>>>                                          int *lenp);
>>>> @@ -353,13 +351,28 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const char *type)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>>>>    {
>>>>         return false;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     while (0)
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>>>> +                                          struct device_node *prev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>>> +     const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>>    static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>>>>                                         const struct device_node *node,
>>>> @@ -373,6 +386,12 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>         return 0;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
>>>>                                           const char *name)
>>>>    {
>>>> @@ -394,6 +413,21 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(
>>>>         return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id **match)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct device_node *np,
>>>>                         const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t sz)
>>>>    {
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:10:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B84929.4050802@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611215147.199B13E0D8D@localhost>

On 11/06/13 22:51, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:55 +0100, Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob, Thomasz,
>>
>> (dredging up an oldish thread as I just ran in to this issue)
>>
>> On 01/04/13 22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2013 02:15 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> This patch moves several for_each macros out of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>> block and adds inline stubs for functions used by these macros, compiled
>>>> conditionally when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
>>>>
>>>> This eliminates the need to explicitly check for CONFIG_OF in driver
>>>> code using mentioned functions and macros.
>>>
>>> Do you have some users of this?
>>
>> I do!
>>
>> Or at least I might.
>>
>> I'm not certain as perhaps the fix to what I describe below is to add
>> dependencies on CONFIG_OF - it isn't clear to me either way:
>>
>> With both psci and arch_timers (CONFIG_ARM_PSCI, CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
>> and without CONFIG_OF we get a build failure because we lack the definition
>> of of_find_matching_node():
>>
>> eg:
>> arch/arm/kernel/psci.c:167:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_find_matching_node’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> The same happens with arm_arch_timer.c (well, there's a patch required to
>> include linux/of.h first, after which Thomasz's patch is relevant).
>
> That code path is completely broken if CONFIG_OF is not set. psci_init()
> is nothing but calls to CONFIG_OF infrastructure! I think that code

Well, it looks like the intention of that code was to just behave like 
there was no relevant node in the case the CONFIG_OF was disabled:

	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
	if (!np)
		return 0;

If of_find_matching() node behaved like of_match_node() then nothing 
would be 'broken' per se, but we would have a bunch of useless code 
compiled in to our kernel.

> needs to depend on CONFIG_OF, or at least be wrapped with
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))" if there are still usable parts when
> CONFIG_OF is disabled. Frankly I don't see that as being a real concern.

Indeed, despite the clarification above, I think it'd be fine to not 
build these without CONFIG_OF.

I'm happy to submit a patches to add dependencies on CONFIG_OF for 
ARM_ARCH_TIMER and ARM_PSCI - I don't think either of those will get any 
complaints because as you say, neither makes very much sense without a 
DT to specify them.

Thanks,
Jonny

>
> That said, Arnd has posted a patch that moves at least some of the function
> prototypes out from under the #ifdef block so that GCC can do syntax
> checking on disabled code. That overlaps a bit with this patch.
>
> Regardless, I'm not going to apply it without a legitimate (as opposed
> to theoretical) user.
>
> g.
>
>> So, I guess the question is whether we should expect PSCI and ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>> to depend on CONFIG_OF, or whether we'd like them to fail gracefully in the
>> case that we *don't* have CONFIG_OF. I think the current situation is broken
>> either way...
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jonny
>>
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/linux/of.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>>>> index a0f1292..7a736b8 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)
>>>>    static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
>>>>    #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
>>>>
>>>> +#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>>>> +#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>>>> +#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>>>> +#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>>>> +#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>>>> +          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>>>> +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> +     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> +          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>>>> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> +     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> +          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>>>> +#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>>>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>>>> +          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>>>> +
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>>
>>>>    /* Pointer for first entry in chain of all nodes. */
>>>> @@ -167,19 +192,10 @@ static inline const char *of_node_full_name(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *name);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *type);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const char *type, const char *compat);
>>>> -#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>>>>         struct device_node *from,
>>>>         const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>> @@ -190,12 +206,6 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>>>>    {
>>>>         return of_find_matching_node_and_match(from, matches, NULL);
>>>>    }
>>>> -#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>>>> -#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>>>> -          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path);
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle);
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node);
>>>> @@ -207,14 +217,6 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct device_node *node,
>>>>                                         const char *name);
>>>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> -          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>>>> -
>>>> -#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>>> -          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>>>> -
>>>>    static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>    {
>>>>         struct device_node *child;
>>>> @@ -228,10 +230,6 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>
>>>>    extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>>>         struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
>>>> -#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>>>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>>>> -          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>>>> -
>>>>    extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node *np,
>>>>                                          const char *name,
>>>>                                          int *lenp);
>>>> @@ -353,13 +351,28 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>>>         return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const char *type)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>>>>    {
>>>>         return false;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>>> -     while (0)
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>>>> +                                          struct device_node *prev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>>> +     const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>>    static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>>>>                                         const struct device_node *node,
>>>> @@ -373,6 +386,12 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>>>         return 0;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
>>>>                                           const char *name)
>>>>    {
>>>> @@ -394,6 +413,21 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(
>>>>         return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id **match)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>>>> +     struct device_node *from,
>>>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct device_node *np,
>>>>                         const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t sz)
>>>>    {
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-12 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-09 20:15 [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF Tomasz Figa
2013-03-09 20:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-01 21:19 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-01 21:19   ` Rob Herring
2013-06-11 16:22   ` Jonathan Austin
2013-06-11 16:22     ` Jonathan Austin
2013-06-11 21:51     ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 21:51       ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 22:35       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-11 22:35         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-12 10:10       ` Jonathan Austin [this message]
2013-06-12 10:10         ` Jonathan Austin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B84929.4050802@arm.com \
    --to=jonathan.austin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.