From: "Brüns, Stefan" <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, "afd@ti.com" <afd@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Peter Meerwald-Stadler" <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:24:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1598491.c75bYYbHRJ@sbruens-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524205641.20252455@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 21:56:54 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:53:35 +0100
>=20
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:09:07 +0200
> >=20
> > Stefan Br=FCns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> > > While the INA226 has a conversion ready flag (CVRF) in the R/W
> > > Mask/Enable
> > > register with read-to-clear semantics, the corresponding bit of the
> > > INA219
> > > (CNVR) is part of the bus voltage register. The flag is cleared by
> > > reading
> > > the power register.
> > >=20
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Br=FCns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> >=20
> > Again, looks good to me, but I would like input form Marc or Andrew
> > who are more familiar with these devices than me!
> >=20
> > Ping me in a week or two if nothing is happening and I look to have
> > lost these!
>=20
> Ah Marc's old email is bouncing. If no one has a more up to
> data address I guess we'll be looking at Andrew to have a chance to
> respond (which is more likely if I actually cc him ;)
Ping ;-)
Kind regards,
Stefan=
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Brüns, Stefan" <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, "afd@ti.com" <afd@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Peter Meerwald-Stadler" <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:24:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1598491.c75bYYbHRJ@sbruens-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524205641.20252455@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 21:56:54 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:53:35 +0100
>
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:09:07 +0200
> >
> > Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> > > While the INA226 has a conversion ready flag (CVRF) in the R/W
> > > Mask/Enable
> > > register with read-to-clear semantics, the corresponding bit of the
> > > INA219
> > > (CNVR) is part of the bus voltage register. The flag is cleared by
> > > reading
> > > the power register.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> >
> > Again, looks good to me, but I would like input form Marc or Andrew
> > who are more familiar with these devices than me!
> >
> > Ping me in a week or two if nothing is happening and I look to have
> > lost these!
>
> Ah Marc's old email is bouncing. If no one has a more up to
> data address I guess we'll be looking at Andrew to have a chance to
> respond (which is more likely if I actually cc him ;)
Ping ;-)
Kind regards,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170524000907.7788-1-stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
2017-05-24 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: adc: ina2xx: Make use of attribute flags consistent on all channels Stefan Brüns
2017-05-24 19:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-24 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: adc: Fix integration time/averaging for INA219/220 Stefan Brüns
2017-05-24 19:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-28 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-06-03 9:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-24 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag Stefan Brüns
2017-05-24 19:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-05-24 19:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-06-19 18:24 ` Brüns, Stefan [this message]
2017-06-19 18:24 ` Brüns, Stefan
2017-06-19 18:30 ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-06-21 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1598491.c75bYYbHRJ@sbruens-linux \
--to=stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.