Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Speed up f2fs truncate

[patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>]

Hello:

This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:10:40 +0800 you wrote:
> Deleting large files is time-consuming, and a large part
> of the time is spent in f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
> ->down_write(sit_info->sentry_lock) and up_write().
> 
> If some blocks are continuous, we can process these blocks
> at the same time. This can reduce the number of calls to
> the down_write() and the up_write(), thereby improving the
> overall speed of doing truncate.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev,v4,1/4] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release/alloc()
    (no matching commit)
  - [f2fs-dev,v4,2/4] f2fs: update_sit_entry_for_release() supports consecutive blocks.
    (no matching commit)
  - [f2fs-dev,v4,3/4] f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/e53c568f4603
  - [f2fs-dev,v4,4/4] f2fs: Optimize f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range()
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html




_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel