From: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
To: <chao@kernel.org>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: ke.wang@unisoc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sunyibuaa@gmail.com,
yi.sun@unisoc.com, Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Speed up f2fs truncate
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:10:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241223081044.1126291-1-yi.sun@unisoc.com> (raw)
Deleting large files is time-consuming, and a large part
of the time is spent in f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
->down_write(sit_info->sentry_lock) and up_write().
If some blocks are continuous, we can process these blocks
at the same time. This can reduce the number of calls to
the down_write() and the up_write(), thereby improving the
overall speed of doing truncate.
Test steps:
Set the CPU and DDR frequencies to the maximum.
dd if=/dev/random of=./test.txt bs=1M count=100000
sync
rm test.txt
Time Comparison of rm:
original optimization ratio
7.17s 3.27s 54.39%
----
v4:
- introduce update_sit_entry_for_alloc().
- [patch 2,3,4 / 4] have no changes compared to v3.
Yi Sun (4):
f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release/alloc()
f2fs: update_sit_entry_for_release() supports consecutive blocks.
f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
f2fs: Optimize f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range()
fs/f2fs/compress.c | 4 +-
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 +-
fs/f2fs/file.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++--
fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 +-
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
To: <chao@kernel.org>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: <sunyibuaa@gmail.com>, <yi.sun@unisoc.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <niuzhiguo84@gmail.com>,
<Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com>, <ke.wang@unisoc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Speed up f2fs truncate
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:10:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241223081044.1126291-1-yi.sun@unisoc.com> (raw)
Deleting large files is time-consuming, and a large part
of the time is spent in f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
->down_write(sit_info->sentry_lock) and up_write().
If some blocks are continuous, we can process these blocks
at the same time. This can reduce the number of calls to
the down_write() and the up_write(), thereby improving the
overall speed of doing truncate.
Test steps:
Set the CPU and DDR frequencies to the maximum.
dd if=/dev/random of=./test.txt bs=1M count=100000
sync
rm test.txt
Time Comparison of rm:
original optimization ratio
7.17s 3.27s 54.39%
----
v4:
- introduce update_sit_entry_for_alloc().
- [patch 2,3,4 / 4] have no changes compared to v3.
Yi Sun (4):
f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release/alloc()
f2fs: update_sit_entry_for_release() supports consecutive blocks.
f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
f2fs: Optimize f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range()
fs/f2fs/compress.c | 4 +-
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 +-
fs/f2fs/file.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++--
fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 +-
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-23 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-23 8:10 Yi Sun [this message]
2024-12-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Speed up f2fs truncate Yi Sun
2024-12-23 8:10 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release/alloc() Yi Sun
2024-12-23 8:10 ` Yi Sun
2024-12-26 14:00 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-12-26 14:00 ` Chao Yu
2024-12-23 8:10 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] f2fs: update_sit_entry_for_release() supports consecutive blocks Yi Sun
2024-12-23 8:10 ` Yi Sun
2024-12-26 14:16 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-12-26 14:16 ` Chao Yu
2024-12-23 8:10 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_blocks() Yi Sun
2024-12-23 8:10 ` Yi Sun
2025-01-13 13:49 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-01-13 13:49 ` Chao Yu
2024-12-23 8:10 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] f2fs: Optimize f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range() Yi Sun
2024-12-23 8:10 ` Yi Sun
2025-01-14 4:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-01-14 4:28 ` Chao Yu
2025-01-15 5:09 ` [f2fs-dev] 答复: " 孙毅 (Yi Sun)
2025-01-15 5:09 ` 孙毅 (Yi Sun)
2025-01-08 18:40 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Speed up f2fs truncate patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-01-08 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
2025-01-13 18:51 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-01-13 18:51 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241223081044.1126291-1-yi.sun@unisoc.com \
--to=yi.sun@unisoc.com \
--cc=Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunyibuaa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.