From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, yepeilin@google.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:40:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175753320852.1544970.3158513977352960891.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250910125740.52172-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:57:38 +0800 you wrote:
> While running './test_progs -t timer' to validate the test case from
> "selftests/bpf: Introduce experimental bpf_in_interrupt()"[0] for
> PREEMPT_RT, I encountered a kernel warning:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
>
> To address this, reject bpf_timer usage in the verifier when
> PREEMPT_RT is enabled, and skip the corresponding timer selftests.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,v3,1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/e25ddfb388c8
- [bpf,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/fbdd61c94bcb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-10 12:57 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175753320852.1544970.3158513977352960891.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.