All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	yepeilin@google.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:57:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910125740.52172-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)

While running './test_progs -t timer' to validate the test case from
"selftests/bpf: Introduce experimental bpf_in_interrupt()"[0] for
PREEMPT_RT, I encountered a kernel warning:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48

To address this, reject bpf_timer usage in the verifier when
PREEMPT_RT is enabled, and skip the corresponding timer selftests.

Changes:
v2 -> v3:
* Drop skipping test case 'timer_interrupt'.
* Address comments from Alexei:
  * Respin targeting bpf tree.
  * Trim commit log.

v1 -> v2:
* Skip test case 'timer_interrupt'.

Links:
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250903140438.59517-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

Leon Hwang (2):
  bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT
  selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                                 | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c   | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c        | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c  | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c    | 4 ++++
 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

--
2.50.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-10 12:57 Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250910125740.52172-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yepeilin@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.