From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
yepeilin@google.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supported
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:57:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910125740.52172-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250910125740.52172-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
When enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, verifier will reject bpf_timer with
returning -EOPNOTSUPP.
Therefore, skip test cases when errno is EOPNOTSUPP.
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
./test_progs -t timer
125 free_timer:SKIP
456 timer:SKIP
457/1 timer_crash/array:SKIP
457/2 timer_crash/hash:SKIP
457 timer_crash:SKIP
458 timer_lockup:SKIP
459 timer_mim:SKIP
Summary: 5/0 PASSED, 6 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
index b7b77a6b29799..0de8facca4c5b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/free_timer.c
@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ void test_free_timer(void)
int err;
skel = free_timer__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
index d66687f1ee6a8..56f660ca567ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ void serial_test_timer(void)
int err;
timer_skel = timer__open_and_load();
+ if (!timer_skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(timer_skel, "timer_skel_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
index f74b82305da8c..b841597c8a3a3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ static void test_timer_crash_mode(int mode)
struct timer_crash *skel;
skel = timer_crash__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "timer_crash__open_and_load"))
return;
skel->bss->pid = getpid();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
index 1a2f99596916f..eb303fa1e09af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ void test_timer_lockup(void)
}
skel = timer_lockup__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "timer_lockup__open_and_load"))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
index 9ff7843909e7d..c930c7d7105b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_mim.c
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ void serial_test_timer_mim(void)
goto cleanup;
timer_skel = timer_mim__open_and_load();
+ if (!timer_skel && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(timer_skel, "timer_skel_load"))
goto cleanup;
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-10 12:57 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 12:57 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-10 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910125740.52172-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.