All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS[4,5]_DT config options
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1773131.OsQeaPpRlR@amdc1227> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1732670.G7NvXXJtxF@amdc1032>

On Monday 23 of September 2013 12:23:51 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
> 
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:45:21 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
[snip]
> > > +	select ARM_AMBA
> > > +	select CLKSRC_OF
> > > +	select CLKSRC_SAMSUNG_PWM if CPU_EXYNOS4210
> > > +	select CPU_EXYNOS4210
> > 
> > The line above shows the brokenness of current layout of Exynos Kconfig
> > options. You need to select some SoC in SAMSUNG EXYNOS4, because
> > otherwise the build will fail if user doesn't select at least one of
> > Exynos4 SoCs.
> > 
> > Instead, I would hide the ARCH_EXYNOS4 and ARCH_EXYNOS4 options and
> > select them from entries of particular SoCs, i.e. ARCH_EXYNOS4 would
> > be selected by CPU_EXYNOS4210, SOC_EXYNOS4212 and SOC_EXYNOS4412,
> > ARCH_EXYNOS5 by SOC_EXYNOS5250 and SOC_EXYNOS5420 and so on.
> 
> This is a good idea but I think that it is better to address it later in
> an incremental patch (which I will also do unless someone beats me to
> it).

OK, sounds good. I take your word for it. ;)

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS[4,5]_DT config options
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1773131.OsQeaPpRlR@amdc1227> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1732670.G7NvXXJtxF@amdc1032>

On Monday 23 of September 2013 12:23:51 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
> 
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:45:21 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
[snip]
> > > +	select ARM_AMBA
> > > +	select CLKSRC_OF
> > > +	select CLKSRC_SAMSUNG_PWM if CPU_EXYNOS4210
> > > +	select CPU_EXYNOS4210
> > 
> > The line above shows the brokenness of current layout of Exynos Kconfig
> > options. You need to select some SoC in SAMSUNG EXYNOS4, because
> > otherwise the build will fail if user doesn't select at least one of
> > Exynos4 SoCs.
> > 
> > Instead, I would hide the ARCH_EXYNOS4 and ARCH_EXYNOS4 options and
> > select them from entries of particular SoCs, i.e. ARCH_EXYNOS4 would
> > be selected by CPU_EXYNOS4210, SOC_EXYNOS4212 and SOC_EXYNOS4412,
> > ARCH_EXYNOS5 by SOC_EXYNOS5250 and SOC_EXYNOS5420 and so on.
> 
> This is a good idea but I think that it is better to address it later in
> an incremental patch (which I will also do unless someone beats me to
> it).

OK, sounds good. I take your word for it. ;)

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-23 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-13  9:28 [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS[4,5]_DT config options Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-09-13  9:28 ` [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS[4, 5]_DT " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-09-17 10:45 ` [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS[4,5]_DT " Tomasz Figa
2013-09-17 10:45   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-23 10:23   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-09-23 10:23     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-09-23 12:34     ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-09-23 12:34       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-26  4:09 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-09-26  4:09   ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1773131.OsQeaPpRlR@amdc1227 \
    --to=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.