From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:20:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178596484913.530543.1573788529936238876.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708065439.1139937-1-alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 14:54:39 +0800 you wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
>
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/28c1ef094e7c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org
To: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:20:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178596484913.530543.1573788529936238876.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708065439.1139937-1-alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 14:54:39 +0800 you wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
>
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/28c1ef094e7c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 6:54 [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion Hao-Qun Huang
2026-07-08 6:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao-Qun Huang
2026-08-03 7:07 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-03 7:07 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-05 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-08-05 21:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178596484913.530543.1573788529936238876.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=alvinhuang0603@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.