All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
@ 2026-07-08  6:54 ` Hao-Qun Huang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hao-Qun Huang @ 2026-07-08  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu
  Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Hao-Qun Huang, stable

F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
rejection added for same-file moves.

For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.

Move the overlap check after the source range has been validated and
len == 0 has been expanded, so it sees the effective length. This is a
no-op for non-zero len (the value is unchanged there) and keeps the
existing early return for identical positions.

Fixes: d95fd91c1ac1 ("f2fs: exclude special cases for f2fs_move_file_range")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
Signed-off-by: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 4b52c56d71f0..fdfef01dc799 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -3144,8 +3144,6 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 	if (src == dst) {
 		if (pos_in == pos_out)
 			return 0;
-		if (pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
-			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	inode_lock(src);
@@ -3171,6 +3169,8 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	if (len == 0)
 		olen = len = src->i_size - pos_in;
+	if (src == dst && pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
+		goto out_unlock;
 	if (pos_in + len == src->i_size)
 		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, F2FS_BLKSIZE) - pos_in;
 	if (len == 0) {
-- 
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
@ 2026-07-08  6:54 ` Hao-Qun Huang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hao-Qun Huang @ 2026-07-08  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu
  Cc: Hao-Qun Huang, linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel

F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
rejection added for same-file moves.

For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.

Move the overlap check after the source range has been validated and
len == 0 has been expanded, so it sees the effective length. This is a
no-op for non-zero len (the value is unchanged there) and keeps the
existing early return for identical positions.

Fixes: d95fd91c1ac1 ("f2fs: exclude special cases for f2fs_move_file_range")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
Signed-off-by: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 4b52c56d71f0..fdfef01dc799 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -3144,8 +3144,6 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 	if (src == dst) {
 		if (pos_in == pos_out)
 			return 0;
-		if (pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
-			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	inode_lock(src);
@@ -3171,6 +3169,8 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	if (len == 0)
 		olen = len = src->i_size - pos_in;
+	if (src == dst && pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
+		goto out_unlock;
 	if (pos_in + len == src->i_size)
 		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, F2FS_BLKSIZE) - pos_in;
 	if (len == 0) {
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
  2026-07-08  6:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao-Qun Huang
@ 2026-08-03  7:07   ` Chao Yu
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel @ 2026-08-03  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao-Qun Huang, Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel

On 7/8/26 14:54, Hao-Qun Huang wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
> 
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
> 
> Move the overlap check after the source range has been validated and
> len == 0 has been expanded, so it sees the effective length. This is a
> no-op for non-zero len (the value is unchanged there) and keeps the
> existing early return for identical positions.
> 
> Fixes: d95fd91c1ac1 ("f2fs: exclude special cases for f2fs_move_file_range")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 4b52c56d71f0..fdfef01dc799 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -3144,8 +3144,6 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>   	if (src == dst) {
>   		if (pos_in == pos_out)
>   			return 0;
> -		if (pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
> -			return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
>   	inode_lock(src);
> @@ -3171,6 +3169,8 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>   		goto out_unlock;
>   	if (len == 0)
>   		olen = len = src->i_size - pos_in;
> +	if (src == dst && pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
> +		goto out_unlock;

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,

>   	if (pos_in + len == src->i_size)
>   		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, F2FS_BLKSIZE) - pos_in;
>   	if (len == 0) {



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
@ 2026-08-03  7:07   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2026-08-03  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao-Qun Huang, Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: chao, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, stable

On 7/8/26 14:54, Hao-Qun Huang wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
> 
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
> 
> Move the overlap check after the source range has been validated and
> len == 0 has been expanded, so it sees the effective length. This is a
> no-op for non-zero len (the value is unchanged there) and keeps the
> existing early return for identical positions.
> 
> Fixes: d95fd91c1ac1 ("f2fs: exclude special cases for f2fs_move_file_range")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Hao-Qun Huang <alvinhuang0603@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 4b52c56d71f0..fdfef01dc799 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -3144,8 +3144,6 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>   	if (src == dst) {
>   		if (pos_in == pos_out)
>   			return 0;
> -		if (pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
> -			return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
>   	inode_lock(src);
> @@ -3171,6 +3169,8 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>   		goto out_unlock;
>   	if (len == 0)
>   		olen = len = src->i_size - pos_in;
> +	if (src == dst && pos_out > pos_in && pos_out < pos_in + len)
> +		goto out_unlock;

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,

>   	if (pos_in + len == src->i_size)
>   		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, F2FS_BLKSIZE) - pos_in;
>   	if (len == 0) {


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
  2026-07-08  6:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao-Qun Huang
@ 2026-08-05 21:20   ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel @ 2026-08-05 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao-Qun Huang; +Cc: jaegeuk, linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel

Hello:

This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:

On Wed,  8 Jul 2026 14:54:39 +0800 you wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
> 
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/28c1ef094e7c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html




_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
@ 2026-08-05 21:20   ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs @ 2026-08-05 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hao-Qun Huang; +Cc: jaegeuk, chao, linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel

Hello:

This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:

On Wed,  8 Jul 2026 14:54:39 +0800 you wrote:
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE treats a zero length as a request to move data
> from pos_in to EOF. However, the same-file overlap check runs before
> that expansion, so a request with len == 0 bypasses the overlap
> rejection added for same-file moves.
> 
> For example, with a four-block file, moving from block 0 to block 1
> with len == 0 is accepted by the old check because pos_in + len is
> still pos_in at that point. The code then expands len to cover the
> rest of the file and calls __exchange_data_block() on overlapping
> source and destination ranges in the same inode, which is the
> data-corruption case the overlap check was meant to reject.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/28c1ef094e7c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-08  6:54 [PATCH] f2fs: reject overlapping move range after len expansion Hao-Qun Huang
2026-07-08  6:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao-Qun Huang
2026-08-03  7:07 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-03  7:07   ` Chao Yu
2026-08-05 21:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-05 21:20   ` patchwork-bot+f2fs

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.