All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:20:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <194200000.1122427210@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050726173126.5368266b.akpm@osdl.org>


> It happens here, a bit.  My machine goes up to 60% dirty when it should be
> clamping at 40%.
> 
> The variable `total_pages' in page-writeback.c (from
> nr_free_pagecache_pages()) is too high.  I trace it back to here:
> 
> On node 0 totalpages: 1572864
>   DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
>   Normal zone: 1568768 pages, LIFO batch:31
>   HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> 
> This machine only has 4G of memory, so the platform code is overestimating
> the number of pages by 50%.  Can you please check your dmesg, see if your
> system is also getting this wrong?

I think we're repeatedly iterating over the same zones by walking the 
zonelists:

static unsigned int nr_free_zone_pages(int offset)
{
        pg_data_t *pgdat;
        unsigned int sum = 0;
        int i;

        for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
                struct zone *zone;

                for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
                        unsigned long size, high;

                        zone = pgdat->node_zones[i];
                        size = zone->present_pages;
                        high = zone->pages_high;

                        if (size > high)
                                sum += size - high;
                }
        }
}

Does that look more sensible? I'd send you a real patch, except the
box just crashed ;-)

M.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:20:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <194200000.1122427210@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050726173126.5368266b.akpm@osdl.org>

> It happens here, a bit.  My machine goes up to 60% dirty when it should be
> clamping at 40%.
> 
> The variable `total_pages' in page-writeback.c (from
> nr_free_pagecache_pages()) is too high.  I trace it back to here:
> 
> On node 0 totalpages: 1572864
>   DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
>   Normal zone: 1568768 pages, LIFO batch:31
>   HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> 
> This machine only has 4G of memory, so the platform code is overestimating
> the number of pages by 50%.  Can you please check your dmesg, see if your
> system is also getting this wrong?

I think we're repeatedly iterating over the same zones by walking the 
zonelists:

static unsigned int nr_free_zone_pages(int offset)
{
        pg_data_t *pgdat;
        unsigned int sum = 0;
        int i;

        for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
                struct zone *zone;

                for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
                        unsigned long size, high;

                        zone = pgdat->node_zones[i];
                        size = zone->present_pages;
                        high = zone->pages_high;

                        if (size > high)
                                sum += size - high;
                }
        }
}

Does that look more sensible? I'd send you a real patch, except the
box just crashed ;-)

M.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-27  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-26 17:35 Memory pressure handling with iSCSI Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:04 ` Roland Dreier
2005-07-26 18:04   ` Roland Dreier
2005-07-26 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:11   ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:39   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:39     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:48     ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:48       ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:12       ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:12         ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 20:36         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 20:36           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:11         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:24           ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:24             ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:45             ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:45               ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 22:10               ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 22:10                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 22:48                 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 23:07                   ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 23:07                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 23:26                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 23:26                       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27  0:31                       ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27  0:31                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27  1:20                         ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2005-07-27  1:20                           ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27  1:26                           ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27  1:26                             ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27  1:47                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27  1:47                               ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27  1:31                         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27  1:31                           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27  1:40                           ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27  1:40                             ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:31     ` Sonny Rao
2005-07-26 19:31       ` Sonny Rao
2005-07-26 20:37       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 20:37         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:21         ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:21           ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 20:59 ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-26 20:59   ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-26 21:05   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:05     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:33     ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-26 21:33       ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-26 22:05       ` Adam Litke
2005-07-26 22:05         ` Adam Litke
2005-07-26 21:12   ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:12     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=194200000.1122427210@flay \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.