From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:40:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050726184042.439e336f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122427889.6433.71.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com>
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This machine only has 4G of memory, so the platform code is overestimating
> > the number of pages by 50%. Can you please check your dmesg, see if your
> > system is also getting this wrong?
>
>
>
> On node 0 totalpages: 1572863
> DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 1568767 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 1 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 2 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 3 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
That's 7.7GB, yes? On a 6GB machine?
If so, that's a bit off, but not grossly.
Here's the dopey debug patch which I used:
- boot
- dmesg -s 1000000 | grep total_pages > foo
- kill off syslogd (sudo service syslog stop)
- run the dd command
- wait for it to hit steady state (max dirty memory)
- dmesg -s 1000000 >> foo
diff -puN mm/page-writeback.c~a mm/page-writeback.c
--- 25/mm/page-writeback.c~a 2005-07-26 15:53:46.000000000 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/mm/page-writeback.c 2005-07-26 16:21:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
dirty_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
if (dirty_ratio > unmapped_ratio / 2)
dirty_ratio = unmapped_ratio / 2;
-
+ printk("vm_dirty_ratio=%d unmapped_ratio=%d dirty_ratio=%d\n",
+ vm_dirty_ratio, unmapped_ratio, dirty_ratio);
if (dirty_ratio < 5)
dirty_ratio = 5;
@@ -171,6 +172,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
background = (background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
dirty = (dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
+ printk("dirty_ratio=%d available_memory=%lu dirty=%lu\n",
+ dirty_ratio, available_memory, dirty);
tsk = current;
if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
background += background / 4;
@@ -209,6 +212,12 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
get_dirty_limits(&wbs, &background_thresh,
&dirty_thresh, mapping);
nr_reclaimable = wbs.nr_dirty + wbs.nr_unstable;
+ printk("background_thresh=%ld dirty_thresh=%ld "
+ "nr_dirty=%ld nr_unstable=%ld "
+ "nr_reclaimable=%ld wbs.nr_writeback=%ld\n",
+ background_thresh, dirty_thresh,
+ wbs.nr_dirty, wbs.nr_unstable,
+ nr_reclaimable, wbs.nr_writeback);
if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh)
break;
@@ -532,6 +541,8 @@ void __init page_writeback_init(void)
total_pages = nr_free_pagecache_pages();
+ printk("total_pages=%ld\n", total_pages);
+
correction = (100 * 4 * buffer_pages) / total_pages;
if (correction < 100) {
_
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:40:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050726184042.439e336f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122427889.6433.71.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com>
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This machine only has 4G of memory, so the platform code is overestimating
> > the number of pages by 50%. Can you please check your dmesg, see if your
> > system is also getting this wrong?
>
>
>
> On node 0 totalpages: 1572863
> DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 1568767 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 1 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 2 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> On node 3 totalpages: 131071
> DMA zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
> Normal zone: 131071 pages, LIFO batch:31
> HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1
That's 7.7GB, yes? On a 6GB machine?
If so, that's a bit off, but not grossly.
Here's the dopey debug patch which I used:
- boot
- dmesg -s 1000000 | grep total_pages > foo
- kill off syslogd (sudo service syslog stop)
- run the dd command
- wait for it to hit steady state (max dirty memory)
- dmesg -s 1000000 >> foo
diff -puN mm/page-writeback.c~a mm/page-writeback.c
--- 25/mm/page-writeback.c~a 2005-07-26 15:53:46.000000000 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/mm/page-writeback.c 2005-07-26 16:21:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
dirty_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
if (dirty_ratio > unmapped_ratio / 2)
dirty_ratio = unmapped_ratio / 2;
-
+ printk("vm_dirty_ratio=%d unmapped_ratio=%d dirty_ratio=%d\n",
+ vm_dirty_ratio, unmapped_ratio, dirty_ratio);
if (dirty_ratio < 5)
dirty_ratio = 5;
@@ -171,6 +172,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(struct writeback_state
background = (background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
dirty = (dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
+ printk("dirty_ratio=%d available_memory=%lu dirty=%lu\n",
+ dirty_ratio, available_memory, dirty);
tsk = current;
if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
background += background / 4;
@@ -209,6 +212,12 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
get_dirty_limits(&wbs, &background_thresh,
&dirty_thresh, mapping);
nr_reclaimable = wbs.nr_dirty + wbs.nr_unstable;
+ printk("background_thresh=%ld dirty_thresh=%ld "
+ "nr_dirty=%ld nr_unstable=%ld "
+ "nr_reclaimable=%ld wbs.nr_writeback=%ld\n",
+ background_thresh, dirty_thresh,
+ wbs.nr_dirty, wbs.nr_unstable,
+ nr_reclaimable, wbs.nr_writeback);
if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh)
break;
@@ -532,6 +541,8 @@ void __init page_writeback_init(void)
total_pages = nr_free_pagecache_pages();
+ printk("total_pages=%ld\n", total_pages);
+
correction = (100 * 4 * buffer_pages) / total_pages;
if (correction < 100) {
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-27 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-26 17:35 Memory pressure handling with iSCSI Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:04 ` Roland Dreier
2005-07-26 18:04 ` Roland Dreier
2005-07-26 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 18:48 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 18:48 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 20:36 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 20:36 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:11 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 22:48 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 23:26 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 23:26 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 1:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27 1:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27 1:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 1:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 1:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27 1:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-27 1:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27 1:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-27 1:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-07-27 1:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 19:31 ` Sonny Rao
2005-07-26 19:31 ` Sonny Rao
2005-07-26 20:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 20:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 20:59 ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-26 20:59 ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-26 21:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-07-26 21:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-26 21:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-26 22:05 ` Adam Litke
2005-07-26 22:05 ` Adam Litke
2005-07-26 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-26 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050726184042.439e336f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.