From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com (Larry McVoy)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199606181641.JAA03609@neteng.engr.sgi.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Jun 18, 96 09:41:47 am
Sadly, it *is* true. I guess many more 6.2 pissed off customers
are waiting down the pipeline.
We can solve it by getting David Miller's development environment
packaged as freeware, (it includes a GNU linker that works)
and put it (really quick) outside the firewall for whoever
is interested.
1) Someone with a couple of days of time needs to take this
and just do it. I was planning on it, but I need
another week or so to start.
2) I'm afraid we'll need to add crt[1n].o as binaries
as these are *not* shipped with the headers and libraries
of 6.2
Any comments, objections from anyone (especially for step 2) ?
>
>If it isn't true, can someone send mail to Tiemann and tell him the
>facts. Sounds like we're getting bad press.
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 05:22:52 -0700
>From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
>To: lm@sgi.com
>Subject: [comp.sys.sgi.apps] gcc part II
>
>Is this not fixed in 6.2? I upgraded my machine at home yesterday, and
>it looked suspiciously like SGI was providing headers and libraries as
>part of the std 6.2 release.
>
> From: jon@vcnet.com (Jon Rust)
> Subject: gcc part II
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.apps
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 22:25:34 -0700
> Organization: IAVC
> Path: cygnus.com!kithrup.com!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net
>!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vcnet.com!jon.vc.net!user
>Lines: 21
>Message-ID: <jon-1706962225340001@jon.vc.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: jon.vc.net
>X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b4
>
> Before I fly off the handle, I wanna make sure this is true.
>
> You can't build ***anything*** unless you fork over a huge wad of cash to
> SGI for their compiler and dev enviro?
>
> **If** this is true, it's horseshit. No wonder SGI is so far down the food
> chain in the land of UNIX. Buying SGI could be one of the biggest mistakes
> I've made since openning my business over 15 months ago. I wonder if my 30
> days are up. Maybe I can ship it back. I only wish I'd bought [insert any
> other UNIX platform here].
>
> If it's not true, could someone plz point me in the right direction to get
> gcc working so I can compile BIND, RADIUS, wuftpd, etc...
>
> pissed off with no build capability,
> jon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Rust
> Internet Access of Ventura County
> jon@vc.net http://www.vc.net 805.383.3500
>
>I know that gcc is not yet 6.2-friendly, but that's much more easily
>fixed than the library/header problem.
>
>Michael
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
--
Peace, Ariel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: Larry McVoy <lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19960618171031.g0V9Z4qnQmOnfEyaluNHOlCmjoowVyoha-2w8MrAUhE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199606181641.JAA03609@neteng.engr.sgi.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Jun 18, 96 09:41:47 am
Sadly, it *is* true. I guess many more 6.2 pissed off customers
are waiting down the pipeline.
We can solve it by getting David Miller's development environment
packaged as freeware, (it includes a GNU linker that works)
and put it (really quick) outside the firewall for whoever
is interested.
1) Someone with a couple of days of time needs to take this
and just do it. I was planning on it, but I need
another week or so to start.
2) I'm afraid we'll need to add crt[1n].o as binaries
as these are *not* shipped with the headers and libraries
of 6.2
Any comments, objections from anyone (especially for step 2) ?
>
>If it isn't true, can someone send mail to Tiemann and tell him the
>facts. Sounds like we're getting bad press.
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 05:22:52 -0700
>From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
>To: lm@sgi.com
>Subject: [comp.sys.sgi.apps] gcc part II
>
>Is this not fixed in 6.2? I upgraded my machine at home yesterday, and
>it looked suspiciously like SGI was providing headers and libraries as
>part of the std 6.2 release.
>
> From: jon@vcnet.com (Jon Rust)
> Subject: gcc part II
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.apps
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 22:25:34 -0700
> Organization: IAVC
> Path: cygnus.com!kithrup.com!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net
>!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vcnet.com!jon.vc.net!user
>Lines: 21
>Message-ID: <jon-1706962225340001@jon.vc.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: jon.vc.net
>X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b4
>
> Before I fly off the handle, I wanna make sure this is true.
>
> You can't build ***anything*** unless you fork over a huge wad of cash to
> SGI for their compiler and dev enviro?
>
> **If** this is true, it's horseshit. No wonder SGI is so far down the food
> chain in the land of UNIX. Buying SGI could be one of the biggest mistakes
> I've made since openning my business over 15 months ago. I wonder if my 30
> days are up. Maybe I can ship it back. I only wish I'd bought [insert any
> other UNIX platform here].
>
> If it's not true, could someone plz point me in the right direction to get
> gcc working so I can compile BIND, RADIUS, wuftpd, etc...
>
> pissed off with no build capability,
> jon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Rust
> Internet Access of Ventura County
> jon@vc.net http://www.vc.net 805.383.3500
>
>I know that gcc is not yet 6.2-friendly, but that's much more easily
>fixed than the library/header problem.
>
>Michael
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
--
Peace, Ariel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-18 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-18 16:41 anyone know if this is true? Larry McVoy
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon [this message]
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
[not found] ` <lm@neteng>
1996-06-18 17:14 ` Donna Yobs
1997-06-19 2:29 ` FYI - free Windows API richard offer
1997-06-19 3:08 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-18 17:11 anyone know if this is true? Dave Olson
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-19 2:07 FYI - free Windows API Larry McVoy
1997-06-19 2:07 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com \
--to=ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=gcc@corp.sgi.com \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=tiemann@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.