From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Cc: lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com (Larry McVoy),
linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:35:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 PDT." <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com>
Hey Ariel, good to hear from you!
It sounds to me like (1) SGI intended to make GCC a viable freeware
option for Irix 6.2, (2) the support in 6.2 is not quite right, due to
slight technical problems. If I understand this correctly, then I think
it won't be too hard to fix the PR-related issues, and I'll be happy to
chime in our support for the intended solution (whatever it may be).
If SGI isn't committing to supplying a reasonable foundation to GNU (w/o
ProDev or IDO), then that's another story.
Michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com>,
linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:35:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19960618173519.lZWqAb66l1IJcIfsrZQ8KBQVFwr-TgGVkpsMgPidPFs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 PDT." <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com>
Hey Ariel, good to hear from you!
It sounds to me like (1) SGI intended to make GCC a viable freeware
option for Irix 6.2, (2) the support in 6.2 is not quite right, due to
slight technical problems. If I understand this correctly, then I think
it won't be too hard to fix the PR-related issues, and I'll be happy to
chime in our support for the intended solution (whatever it may be).
If SGI isn't committing to supplying a reasonable foundation to GNU (w/o
ProDev or IDO), then that's another story.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-18 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-18 16:41 anyone know if this is true? Larry McVoy
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann [this message]
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
[not found] ` <lm@neteng>
1996-06-18 17:14 ` Donna Yobs
1997-06-19 2:29 ` FYI - free Windows API richard offer
1997-06-19 3:08 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-18 17:11 anyone know if this is true? Dave Olson
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-19 2:07 FYI - free Windows API Larry McVoy
1997-06-19 2:07 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com \
--to=tiemann@cygnus.com \
--cc=ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=gcc@corp.sgi.com \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.