From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a82eeb8-bb95-4fad-acce-798ba0cda170@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605-abdomen-starch-4fd4d7ead431@spud>
On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate,
>> add it as optional.
>
> What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is
> now usable there?
Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled
by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ?
Neil
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a82eeb8-bb95-4fad-acce-798ba0cda170@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605-abdomen-starch-4fd4d7ead431@spud>
On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate,
>> add it as optional.
>
> What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is
> now usable there?
Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled
by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ?
Neil
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a82eeb8-bb95-4fad-acce-798ba0cda170@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605-abdomen-starch-4fd4d7ead431@spud>
On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate,
>> add it as optional.
>
> What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is
> now usable there?
Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled
by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ?
Neil
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 9:37 [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains Neil Armstrong
2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a82eeb8-bb95-4fad-acce-798ba0cda170@linaro.org \
--to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.