* [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-05 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl Cc: linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel, Neil Armstrong On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, add it as optional. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml index 7e8328e9ce13..f748f3a60b35 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ properties: nvmem-cell-names: const: temperature_calib + power-domains: + maxItems: 1 + allOf: - if: properties: --- base-commit: c3f38fa61af77b49866b006939479069cd451173 change-id: 20240605-topic-amlogic-upstream-bindings-fixes-power-domains-sardac-0f9d22e7e558 Best regards, -- Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-05 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl Cc: linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel, Neil Armstrong On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, add it as optional. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml index 7e8328e9ce13..f748f3a60b35 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ properties: nvmem-cell-names: const: temperature_calib + power-domains: + maxItems: 1 + allOf: - if: properties: --- base-commit: c3f38fa61af77b49866b006939479069cd451173 change-id: 20240605-topic-amlogic-upstream-bindings-fixes-power-domains-sardac-0f9d22e7e558 Best regards, -- Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-05 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl Cc: linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel, Neil Armstrong On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, add it as optional. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml index 7e8328e9ce13..f748f3a60b35 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/amlogic,meson-saradc.yaml @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ properties: nvmem-cell-names: const: temperature_calib + power-domains: + maxItems: 1 + allOf: - if: properties: --- base-commit: c3f38fa61af77b49866b006939479069cd451173 change-id: 20240605-topic-amlogic-upstream-bindings-fixes-power-domains-sardac-0f9d22e7e558 Best regards, -- Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong (?) @ 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-05 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 255 bytes --] On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > add it as optional. What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is now usable there? [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-05 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 255 bytes --] On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > add it as optional. What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is now usable there? [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-05 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 255 bytes --] On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > add it as optional. What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is now usable there? [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley (?) @ 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-06 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, >> add it as optional. > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > now usable there? Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? Neil _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-06 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, >> add it as optional. > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > now usable there? Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? Neil _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Neil Armstrong @ 2024-06-06 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, >> add it as optional. > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > now usable there? Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? Neil ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong (?) @ 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-06 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --] On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > add it as optional. > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > now usable there? > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a new commit message though. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-06 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --] On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > add it as optional. > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > now usable there? > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a new commit message though. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2024-06-06 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --] On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > add it as optional. > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > now usable there? > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a new commit message though. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley (?) @ 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-06-08 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Neil Armstrong, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:21:17 +0100 Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > > add it as optional. > > > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > > now usable there? > > > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? > > I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT > doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the > commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a > new commit message though. > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Applied _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-06-08 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Neil Armstrong, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:21:17 +0100 Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > > add it as optional. > > > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > > now usable there? > > > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? > > I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT > doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the > commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a > new commit message though. > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Applied _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains @ 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-06-08 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Neil Armstrong, Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Kevin Hilman, Jerome Brunet, Martin Blumenstingl, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-amlogic, linux-kernel On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:21:17 +0100 Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 05/06/2024 18:58, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > > On newer SoCs, the SAR ADC hardware can require a power-domain to operate, > > > > add it as optional. > > > > > > What about the older socs that don't have power domains, the property is > > > now usable there? > > > > Old SoCs doesn't necessarily have an associated power domain, or was handled > > by firmware, does it harm if we make it optional for older ones as well ? > > I mean, really all of these devices have a power domain, even if the DT > doesn't describe one as it's hardly gonna work without power, so the > commit message just seems odd to me. I don't care enough to ask for a > new commit message though. > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Applied ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-08 17:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-06-05 9:37 [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: amlogic,meson-saradc: add optional power-domains Neil Armstrong 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong 2024-06-05 9:37 ` Neil Armstrong 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-05 16:58 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong 2024-06-06 7:54 ` Neil Armstrong 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-06 16:21 ` Conor Dooley 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-06-08 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.