From: Bowers, AndrewX <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] virtchnl: Add missing explicit padding to structures
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:50:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e732391d4e94bbc87ab01ee80934fd3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416095049.12917-1-geert@linux-m68k.org>
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 2:51 AM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>; David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] virtchnl: Add missing explicit padding to structures
On e.g. m68k, the alignment of 32-bit values is only 2 bytes, leading
to:
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:577:1: note: in expansion of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(272, virtchnl_filter);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:577:32: error: enumerator value for ?virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_filter? is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(272, virtchnl_filter);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:619:1: note: in expansion of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_pf_event);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:619:31: error: enumerator value for ?virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_pf_event? is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_pf_event);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:640:1: note: in expansion of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(12, virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:640:31: error: enumerator value for ?virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info? is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(12, virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:647:1: note: in expansion of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:647:31: error: enumerator value for ?virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info? is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ?VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN?
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
Fix this by adding explicit padding to structures with holes.
Reported-by: noreply at ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
Exposed by the "select PCI" in commit 4be5e8648b0c287a ("media: move CEC platform drivers to a separate directory").
---
include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] virtchnl: Add missing explicit padding to structures
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:50:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e732391d4e94bbc87ab01ee80934fd3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416095049.12917-1-geert@linux-m68k.org>
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 2:51 AM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>; David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] virtchnl: Add missing explicit padding to structures
On e.g. m68k, the alignment of 32-bit values is only 2 bytes, leading
to:
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:577:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(272, virtchnl_filter);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:577:32: error: enumerator value for ‘virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_filter’ is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(272, virtchnl_filter);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:619:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_pf_event);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:619:31: error: enumerator value for ‘virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_pf_event’ is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_pf_event);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:640:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(12, virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:640:31: error: enumerator value for ‘virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info’ is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(12, virtchnl_iwarp_qv_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:36: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:647:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:647:31: error: enumerator value for ‘virtchnl_static_assert_virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info’ is not an integer constant
VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, virtchnl_iwarp_qvlist_info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h:147:53: note: in definition of macro ‘VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN’
{ virtchnl_static_assert_##X = (n)/((sizeof(struct X) == (n)) ? 1 : 0) }
^
Fix this by adding explicit padding to structures with holes.
Reported-by: noreply@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
Exposed by the "select PCI" in commit 4be5e8648b0c287a ("media: move CEC platform drivers to a separate directory").
---
include/linux/avf/virtchnl.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 9:50 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] virtchnl: Add missing explicit padding to structures Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-04-16 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-04-22 18:50 ` Bowers, AndrewX [this message]
2020-04-22 18:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bowers, AndrewX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e732391d4e94bbc87ab01ee80934fd3@intel.com \
--to=andrewx.bowers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.