All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	khilman@baylibre.com
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: meson: fix drive strength register and bit calculation
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:59:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jeeqd3i9k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611053958.GA3687@home-desktop>


On Thu 11 Jun 2020 at 07:40, Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:09:42PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 06:13, hhk7734@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > If a GPIO bank has greater than 16 pins, PAD_DS_REG is split into two
>> > registers. However, when register and bit were calculated, the first
>> > register defined in the bank was used, and the bit was calculated based
>> > on the first pin. This causes problems in setting the driving strength.
>> >
>> > Solved the problem by changing the bit using a mask and selecting the
>> > next register when the bit exceeds 15.
>> 
>> This fixes the case of GPIOX on g12 which goes up to 18 yes but the same
>> problem will happen again a if bank ever goes past 31 pins. In such case
>> the problem would apply to all reg types.
>> 
>> I would prefer if it was solved in a more generic fashion, like defining
>> a "stride" table with the values of each reg type. This table can common
>> to all aml SoCs for now but eventually it probably need to be SoC
>> specific.
>> 
>> This would allow to :
>> A) handle the case you are reporting in a generic (future proof) way
>> B) remove the weird "bit = bit << 1;" calc in place in the get/set of
>> the drive strengh pinconf
>
> If all amlogic SoC has same register style, I think the code below is fine.
>
> static const unsigned int meson_bit_strides[] = {
> 	0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
> };

 the table above is the shift, not the stride.
 Maybe 'width' is a better description
 I would prefer if it was { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 } and adjust the caculation

A part from this, your proposition is exactly what I meant :) Thx

>
> static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
> 				   enum meson_reg_type reg_type,
> 				   unsigned int *reg, unsigned int *bit)
> {
> 	struct meson_reg_desc *desc = &bank->regs[reg_type];
>
> 	*bit = (desc->bit + pin - bank->first) << meson_bit_strides[reg_type];
> 	*reg = (desc->reg + (*bit / 32)) * 4;
> 	*bit &= 0x1f;
> }
>
> How about this?
>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c | 7 +++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > index bbc919bef2bf..ef66239b7df5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
>> >
>> >  	*reg = desc->reg * 4;
>> >  	*bit = desc->bit + pin - bank->first;
>> > +
>> > +	if (reg_type == REG_DS) {
>> > +		if (*bit > 15) {
>> > +			*bit &= 0xf;
>> > +			*reg += 4;
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static int meson_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev)
>> 


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	khilman@baylibre.com
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: meson: fix drive strength register and bit calculation
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:59:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jeeqd3i9k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611053958.GA3687@home-desktop>


On Thu 11 Jun 2020 at 07:40, Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:09:42PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 06:13, hhk7734@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > If a GPIO bank has greater than 16 pins, PAD_DS_REG is split into two
>> > registers. However, when register and bit were calculated, the first
>> > register defined in the bank was used, and the bit was calculated based
>> > on the first pin. This causes problems in setting the driving strength.
>> >
>> > Solved the problem by changing the bit using a mask and selecting the
>> > next register when the bit exceeds 15.
>> 
>> This fixes the case of GPIOX on g12 which goes up to 18 yes but the same
>> problem will happen again a if bank ever goes past 31 pins. In such case
>> the problem would apply to all reg types.
>> 
>> I would prefer if it was solved in a more generic fashion, like defining
>> a "stride" table with the values of each reg type. This table can common
>> to all aml SoCs for now but eventually it probably need to be SoC
>> specific.
>> 
>> This would allow to :
>> A) handle the case you are reporting in a generic (future proof) way
>> B) remove the weird "bit = bit << 1;" calc in place in the get/set of
>> the drive strengh pinconf
>
> If all amlogic SoC has same register style, I think the code below is fine.
>
> static const unsigned int meson_bit_strides[] = {
> 	0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
> };

 the table above is the shift, not the stride.
 Maybe 'width' is a better description
 I would prefer if it was { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 } and adjust the caculation

A part from this, your proposition is exactly what I meant :) Thx

>
> static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
> 				   enum meson_reg_type reg_type,
> 				   unsigned int *reg, unsigned int *bit)
> {
> 	struct meson_reg_desc *desc = &bank->regs[reg_type];
>
> 	*bit = (desc->bit + pin - bank->first) << meson_bit_strides[reg_type];
> 	*reg = (desc->reg + (*bit / 32)) * 4;
> 	*bit &= 0x1f;
> }
>
> How about this?
>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c | 7 +++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > index bbc919bef2bf..ef66239b7df5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
>> >
>> >  	*reg = desc->reg * 4;
>> >  	*bit = desc->bit + pin - bank->first;
>> > +
>> > +	if (reg_type == REG_DS) {
>> > +		if (*bit > 15) {
>> > +			*bit &= 0xf;
>> > +			*reg += 4;
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static int meson_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev)
>> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	khilman@baylibre.com
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: meson: fix drive strength register and bit calculation
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:59:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jeeqd3i9k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611053958.GA3687@home-desktop>


On Thu 11 Jun 2020 at 07:40, Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:09:42PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed 10 Jun 2020 at 06:13, hhk7734@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > If a GPIO bank has greater than 16 pins, PAD_DS_REG is split into two
>> > registers. However, when register and bit were calculated, the first
>> > register defined in the bank was used, and the bit was calculated based
>> > on the first pin. This causes problems in setting the driving strength.
>> >
>> > Solved the problem by changing the bit using a mask and selecting the
>> > next register when the bit exceeds 15.
>> 
>> This fixes the case of GPIOX on g12 which goes up to 18 yes but the same
>> problem will happen again a if bank ever goes past 31 pins. In such case
>> the problem would apply to all reg types.
>> 
>> I would prefer if it was solved in a more generic fashion, like defining
>> a "stride" table with the values of each reg type. This table can common
>> to all aml SoCs for now but eventually it probably need to be SoC
>> specific.
>> 
>> This would allow to :
>> A) handle the case you are reporting in a generic (future proof) way
>> B) remove the weird "bit = bit << 1;" calc in place in the get/set of
>> the drive strengh pinconf
>
> If all amlogic SoC has same register style, I think the code below is fine.
>
> static const unsigned int meson_bit_strides[] = {
> 	0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
> };

 the table above is the shift, not the stride.
 Maybe 'width' is a better description
 I would prefer if it was { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 } and adjust the caculation

A part from this, your proposition is exactly what I meant :) Thx

>
> static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
> 				   enum meson_reg_type reg_type,
> 				   unsigned int *reg, unsigned int *bit)
> {
> 	struct meson_reg_desc *desc = &bank->regs[reg_type];
>
> 	*bit = (desc->bit + pin - bank->first) << meson_bit_strides[reg_type];
> 	*reg = (desc->reg + (*bit / 32)) * 4;
> 	*bit &= 0x1f;
> }
>
> How about this?
>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonki Hong <hhk7734@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c | 7 +++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > index bbc919bef2bf..ef66239b7df5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c
>> > @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ static void meson_calc_reg_and_bit(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int pin,
>> >
>> >  	*reg = desc->reg * 4;
>> >  	*bit = desc->bit + pin - bank->first;
>> > +
>> > +	if (reg_type == REG_DS) {
>> > +		if (*bit > 15) {
>> > +			*bit &= 0xf;
>> > +			*reg += 4;
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static int meson_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev)
>> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10  4:13 [PATCH] pinctrl: meson: fix drive strength register and bit calculation hhk7734
2020-06-10  4:13 ` hhk7734
2020-06-10  4:13 ` hhk7734
2020-06-10 13:09 ` Jerome Brunet
2020-06-10 13:09   ` Jerome Brunet
2020-06-10 13:09   ` Jerome Brunet
2020-06-11  5:40   ` Hyeonki Hong
2020-06-11  5:40     ` Hyeonki Hong
2020-06-11  5:40     ` Hyeonki Hong
2020-06-17 13:59     ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2020-06-17 13:59       ` Jerome Brunet
2020-06-17 13:59       ` Jerome Brunet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1jeeqd3i9k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=hhk7734@gmail.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.