Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

Hi!

> > There are 32 signals, and signals can carry more information, if
> > required. I really think doing it way UPS-es are done is right
> > approach.
> 
> I would think that it would make sense to keep shutdown with all the other
> power management events. Perhaps it will makes more sense to handle UPS's
> through the power management code.

Yes, that would be another acceptable solution. Situation where half
of power managment (UPS) is done with init and half with acpid is not
acceptable. [I doubt UPS users will want to switch. Why invent new
daemon when init is doing perfect job?]

However, I believe that simple way of sending signal to init is best
solution. It will suffice in 99% cases, users already know how to
configure init, and it does not need another process in userspace. In
remaining 1% case, init can simply notify acpid that even came.

I believe that one-patch is still worth applying. *Maybe* signal
should be changed to SIGUSR1 (to make room for SIGUSR2 to be sleep
button).
								Pavel
-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org