From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: AJ Lewis <lewis@sistina.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@linuxcare.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Martin Kasper Petersen <mkp@linuxcare.com>,
riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:48:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010419204819.D30135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com>; from lewis@sistina.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:29:27PM -0500
On Thu, Apr 19 2001, AJ Lewis wrote:
> It is unfortunate that this could not have been resolved in a more mature
> manner. Saying "I don't like the way somebody is doing something. I won't
> bother to talk to them about it, I'll just flame them and try to undermine
> their work." is not acceptable. It would have been nice if you'd actually
> tried to work this out instead of handling it this way.
LVM concerns us all now that it is not just an addon, but actually a
part of the kernel. Rejecting mails and reports from users and
developers who just might be able to lend you a hand fixing bugs, is not
just counter productive it's downright rude!
Besides, I didn't think the posting was flame material at all. If
nothing else, it's a wake up call.
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: AJ Lewis <lewis@sistina.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@linuxcare.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Martin Kasper Petersen <mkp@linuxcare.com>,
riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:48:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010419204819.D30135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d37l0gvkuf.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com>; from lewis@sistina.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:29:27PM -0500
On Thu, Apr 19 2001, AJ Lewis wrote:
> It is unfortunate that this could not have been resolved in a more mature
> manner. Saying "I don't like the way somebody is doing something. I won't
> bother to talk to them about it, I'll just flame them and try to undermine
> their work." is not acceptable. It would have been nice if you'd actually
> tried to work this out instead of handling it this way.
LVM concerns us all now that it is not just an addon, but actually a
part of the kernel. Rejecting mails and reports from users and
developers who just might be able to lend you a hand fixing bugs, is not
just counter productive it's downright rude!
Besides, I didn't think the posting was flame material at all. If
nothing else, it's a wake up call.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-19 17:51 [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 18:29 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 18:29 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 18:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-19 18:35 ` [linux-lvm] " Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 18:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-24 14:58 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 14:58 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 18:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-04-19 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-24 14:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 14:54 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 19:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:24 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:24 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:33 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 19:33 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 19:46 ` [linux-lvm] " Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-24 15:00 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 15:00 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 19:35 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:35 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:44 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:44 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Andreas Dilger
2001-04-19 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:53 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 20:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 20:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 21:52 ` Miles Lane
2001-04-19 20:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-19 20:16 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-20 10:34 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-04-20 0:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-19 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-04-20 1:29 ` Paul Jakma
2001-04-20 1:29 ` Paul Jakma
2001-04-24 14:47 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 20:33 ` Miles Lane
2001-04-19 20:33 ` Miles Lane
2001-04-20 12:36 ` [linux-lvm] " Doug McNaught
2001-04-20 12:36 ` Doug McNaught
2001-04-20 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Matti Aarnio
2001-04-20 22:55 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-21 20:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Rik van Riel
2001-04-21 20:45 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:17 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:26 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:26 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:40 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:40 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:19 ` [linux-lvm] " Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:40 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 21:25 ` Kurt Garloff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-19 19:48 [linux-lvm] linux-lvm list now open AJ Lewis
2001-04-20 19:24 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-20 17:39 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-04-20 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 18:25 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-23 10:16 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-23 9:50 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 23:28 Cygnus
2001-04-20 0:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-20 7:37 Luca Berra
2001-04-20 7:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-21 17:03 ` Ben Lutgens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010419204819.D30135@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=jes@linuxcare.com \
--cc=lewis@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org \
--cc=mkp@linuxcare.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.