From: Miles Lane <miles@megapathdsl.net>
To: AJ Lewis <lewis@sistina.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@linuxcare.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Martin Kasper Petersen <mkp@linuxcare.com>,
riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:33:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADF4BA3.1080606@megapathdsl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010419142400.E10345@sistina.com
AJ Lewis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:02:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>Well their approach to patches that fix bugs is to reject emails. They've done
>>that to stuff I've reported any many others. So there is a problem. And its
>>kind of hard to discuss a problem when you are being moderated out of existance.
>>
>
> Hmm...i guess there is a communication issue here. It sounds like the
> message that our ML server was sending was misleading. We were not
> rejecting mail because of content. The ML server was rejecting it because
> the address was not subscribed. Our idea was that we don't want spam.
> If it's completely unmoderated, then we will get a *lot* of spam.
Gosh, this seems like a bit of a red herring, IMHO. Do you think the
LKML gets a "lot" of spam? Or, how about the linux-usb-devel or
linux-hotplug-devel lists? None of these lists are moderated and the
occasional spam gets sent to them, but I haven't noticed there being
enough spam to hinder the usefulness of these lists.
Miles
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Lane <miles@megapathdsl.net>
To: AJ Lewis <lewis@sistina.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@linuxcare.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Martin Kasper Petersen <mkp@linuxcare.com>,
riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:33:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADF4BA3.1080606@megapathdsl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com> <E14qJhd-0007oR-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010419142400.E10345@sistina.com>
AJ Lewis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:02:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>Well their approach to patches that fix bugs is to reject emails. They've done
>>that to stuff I've reported any many others. So there is a problem. And its
>>kind of hard to discuss a problem when you are being moderated out of existance.
>>
>
> Hmm...i guess there is a communication issue here. It sounds like the
> message that our ML server was sending was misleading. We were not
> rejecting mail because of content. The ML server was rejecting it because
> the address was not subscribed. Our idea was that we don't want spam.
> If it's completely unmoderated, then we will get a *lot* of spam.
Gosh, this seems like a bit of a red herring, IMHO. Do you think the
LKML gets a "lot" of spam? Or, how about the linux-usb-devel or
linux-hotplug-devel lists? None of these lists are moderated and the
occasional spam gets sent to them, but I haven't noticed there being
enough spam to hinder the usefulness of these lists.
Miles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-19 17:51 [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 18:29 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 18:29 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 18:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-19 18:35 ` [linux-lvm] " Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 18:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-24 14:58 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 14:58 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 18:48 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-24 14:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 14:54 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 19:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:24 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:24 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:33 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 19:33 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 19:46 ` [linux-lvm] " Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-24 15:00 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-24 15:00 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 19:35 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:35 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:44 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:44 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Andreas Dilger
2001-04-19 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:53 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 20:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 20:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 21:52 ` Miles Lane
2001-04-19 20:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-19 20:16 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-20 10:34 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-04-20 0:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-19 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-04-20 1:29 ` Paul Jakma
2001-04-20 1:29 ` Paul Jakma
2001-04-24 14:47 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 20:33 ` Miles Lane [this message]
2001-04-19 20:33 ` Miles Lane
2001-04-20 12:36 ` [linux-lvm] " Doug McNaught
2001-04-20 12:36 ` Doug McNaught
2001-04-20 22:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Matti Aarnio
2001-04-20 22:55 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-21 20:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Rik van Riel
2001-04-21 20:45 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:17 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:26 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:26 ` AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:40 ` [linux-lvm] " Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:40 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-19 19:19 ` [linux-lvm] " Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2001-04-19 19:40 ` [linux-lvm] " AJ Lewis
2001-04-19 19:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 19:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 21:25 ` Kurt Garloff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-19 19:48 [linux-lvm] linux-lvm list now open AJ Lewis
2001-04-20 19:24 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-20 17:39 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-04-20 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 18:25 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-23 10:16 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-23 9:50 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-19 23:28 Cygnus
2001-04-20 0:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-20 7:37 Luca Berra
2001-04-20 7:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-21 17:03 ` Ben Lutgens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADF4BA3.1080606@megapathdsl.net \
--to=miles@megapathdsl.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jes@linuxcare.com \
--cc=lewis@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org \
--cc=mkp@linuxcare.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.