From: Will <will@egregious.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skb destructor enhancement idea
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:50:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010625155016.B17735@egregious.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010618134644.A5938@egregious.net> <20010618145331.A32166@wacko.asicdesigners.com> <20010621161349.A27654@egregious.net> <20010625140613.A17207@egregious.net> <15159.48229.326223.682824@pizda.ninka.net>
In-Reply-To: <15159.48229.326223.682824@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:34:13PM -0700
David S. Miller wrote:
> I think the idea totally stinks.
The idea, or just the performance implications of my particular implementation? If
this could be done without a global spinlock would you still object to the
construction of the small linked list in each skb?
> Add an ifdef and the knobs you need to the skb struct directly just
> like netfilter does.
So I should #ifdef throughout the tcp and socket code wherever skb's 'destructor' is
called to call mine as well? And multiply that by N driver writers who'd like to do
the same thing? Sounds messy...
--
-Will :: AD6XL :: http://tyranny.egregious.net/~will/
Orton :: finger will@tyranny.egregious.net for GPG public key
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010618134644.A5938@egregious.net>
[not found] ` <20010618145331.A32166@wacko.asicdesigners.com>
[not found] ` <20010621161349.A27654@egregious.net>
2001-06-25 21:06 ` [PATCH] skb destructor enhancement idea Will
2001-06-25 22:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-25 22:50 ` Will [this message]
2001-06-25 23:12 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-26 8:35 ` When the FUD is all around (sniff) Luigi Genoni
2001-06-26 12:33 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-06-27 21:08 ` Fabrice Gautier
2001-06-26 12:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 14:59 ` [OT] " Jordan Crouse
2001-06-26 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 15:09 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 17:41 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-26 15:06 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 15:28 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-06-26 22:47 ` lk
2001-06-27 12:44 ` Marco Colombo
2001-06-26 14:19 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-26 14:38 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-26 15:16 ` Jonathan Corbet
2001-06-26 16:43 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-26 17:00 ` Kip Macy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010625155016.B17735@egregious.net \
--to=will@egregious.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.