From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?]
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:18:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928171805.B23261@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109281826.f8SIQLP06585@deathstar.prodigy.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281535220.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20010928123455.B8222@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20010928145324.A14801@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <20010928230034.F15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20010928153301.A23261@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <20010929000000.G15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20010929000000.G15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 12:00:00AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I'll dig out the patch tomorrow.
>
You don't happen to have that patch available (in current form, of course)
somewhere for download do you?
couldn't find a web site with your patches either, except for the ARM site,
and your personal page there... Do you have a page with all of your misc
patches?
Also noticed there isn't a ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rmk...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 3:17 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Thomas Hood
2001-09-28 3:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14 ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34 ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
[not found] ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 22:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-29 0:18 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-29 1:08 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29 1:20 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-29 1:25 ` [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 11:14 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928171805.B23261@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.