From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:08:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928180819.A29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB3EBC1.DE9AA505@yahoo.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109280049380.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109280049380.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:50:21AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > Either 2.4.9-ac16 has much improved VM performance over
> > previous 2.4 kernels (under moderate load, at least), or someone
> > sneaked in to my apartment last night and upgraded my machine
> > while I was asleep. I'm leaning toward the latter explanation.
>
> Now that the -ac VM was stable for a few weeks, I thought
> it might be time to sneak in some big performance changes,
> finally.
>
> They seem to work ;)
>
Is it normal to have Inact_target 1/4 of main memory (64MB of 256MB RAM)?
In previous versions, this value would fluctuate with the load of the system.
Is this expected?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 3:17 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Thomas Hood
2001-09-28 3:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14 ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34 ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
[not found] ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 22:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-29 0:18 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29 1:08 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-29 1:20 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Rik van Riel
2001-09-29 1:25 ` [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 11:14 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928180819.A29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.