From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?]
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:25:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928182532.B29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010928180819.A29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109282217530.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109282217530.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:20:37PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> As usual, thanks go out to Matt Dillon for finding
> this balancing point.
>
> I guess it really is time to stop reinventing the wheel ;)
>
I've read the archived thread between you and Matt, and he mentioned that
what he described was about three years old.
What did they do before that?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 3:17 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Thomas Hood
2001-09-28 3:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14 ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34 ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
[not found] ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 22:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-29 0:18 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29 1:08 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29 1:20 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-29 1:25 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-10-01 11:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928182532.B29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.