* [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa [not found] <20011204134445.GA9231@riva.ucam.org> @ 2001-12-05 15:59 ` Richard Hirst 2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Hirst @ 2001-12-05 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Colin Watson; +Cc: debian-hppa, parisc-linux On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:44:45PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what's up with the groff build on hppa? gcc has > segfaulted on both 1.17.2-10 and 1.17.2-11, and I can reproduce this on > paer. The function it dies on hasn't changed since earlier releases > where hppa didn't have a problem. > > Is there any workaround? I'd rather not have to change groff at this > stage if I can avoid it. Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is any help. Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa 2001-12-05 15:59 ` [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa Richard Hirst @ 2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung 2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Randolph Chung @ 2001-12-05 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Hirst; +Cc: Colin Watson, debian-hppa, parisc-linux > Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is > any help. This is a known bug with the compiler... .building with -fno-strength-reduce works around this bug. randolph -- Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org> http://www.TauSq.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa 2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung @ 2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson 2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Colin Watson @ 2001-12-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randolph Chung; +Cc: Richard Hirst, debian-hppa, parisc-linux On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:19:39AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is > > any help. > > This is a known bug with the compiler... .building with > -fno-strength-reduce works around this bug. So would there be objections to me doing a special build on hppa with the CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS hacked, given that there are three days left, or do I have to upload again? -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa 2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson @ 2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Randolph Chung @ 2001-12-05 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Colin Watson; +Cc: Richard Hirst, debian-hppa, parisc-linux > So would there be objections to me doing a special build on hppa with > the CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS hacked, given that there are three days left, or do > I have to upload again? Please make the appropriate source changes and make another upload. Source-hacks that don't end up in the archive are considered very bad practice. There's a possible patch to fix this problem. I'm verifying this with upstream at the moment. randolph -- Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org> http://www.TauSq.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-05 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20011204134445.GA9231@riva.ucam.org>
2001-12-05 15:59 ` [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa Richard Hirst
2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung
2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson
2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.