* [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa
[not found] <20011204134445.GA9231@riva.ucam.org>
@ 2001-12-05 15:59 ` Richard Hirst
2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Hirst @ 2001-12-05 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin Watson; +Cc: debian-hppa, parisc-linux
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:44:45PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what's up with the groff build on hppa? gcc has
> segfaulted on both 1.17.2-10 and 1.17.2-11, and I can reproduce this on
> paer. The function it dies on hasn't changed since earlier releases
> where hppa didn't have a problem.
>
> Is there any workaround? I'd rather not have to change groff at this
> stage if I can avoid it.
Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is
any help.
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa
2001-12-05 15:59 ` [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa Richard Hirst
@ 2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung
2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randolph Chung @ 2001-12-05 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Hirst; +Cc: Colin Watson, debian-hppa, parisc-linux
> Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is
> any help.
This is a known bug with the compiler... .building with
-fno-strength-reduce works around this bug.
randolph
--
Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org>
http://www.TauSq.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa
2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung
@ 2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson
2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin Watson @ 2001-12-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randolph Chung; +Cc: Richard Hirst, debian-hppa, parisc-linux
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:19:39AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > Builds for me with -O1 rather than -O2 in debian/rules, if that is
> > any help.
>
> This is a known bug with the compiler... .building with
> -fno-strength-reduce works around this bug.
So would there be objections to me doing a special build on hppa with
the CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS hacked, given that there are three days left, or do
I have to upload again?
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa
2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson
@ 2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randolph Chung @ 2001-12-05 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin Watson; +Cc: Richard Hirst, debian-hppa, parisc-linux
> So would there be objections to me doing a special build on hppa with
> the CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS hacked, given that there are three days left, or do
> I have to upload again?
Please make the appropriate source changes and make another upload.
Source-hacks that don't end up in the archive are considered very bad
practice.
There's a possible patch to fix this problem. I'm verifying this with
upstream at the moment.
randolph
--
Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org>
http://www.TauSq.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-05 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20011204134445.GA9231@riva.ucam.org>
2001-12-05 15:59 ` [parisc-linux] Re: groff build on hppa Richard Hirst
2001-12-05 16:19 ` Randolph Chung
2001-12-05 16:39 ` Colin Watson
2001-12-05 17:03 ` Randolph Chung
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.