* Signals
@ 2001-12-27 11:05 Carsten Langgaard
2001-12-27 21:53 ` Signals Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Langgaard @ 2001-12-27 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
Why is the signals definition (in include/asm-mips/signal.h) for MIPS
different from everybody else ?
For example:
#define SIGBUS 10 (MIPS)
#define SIGBUS 7 (I386)
#define SIGSTKFLT 16 (I386, doesn't exist on MIPS)
Is there any reason for this ?
/Carsten
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Signals
2001-12-27 11:05 Signals Carsten Langgaard
@ 2001-12-27 21:53 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2001-12-27 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Langgaard; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:05:55PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> Why is the signals definition (in include/asm-mips/signal.h) for MIPS
> different from everybody else ?
> For example:
>
> Hdefine SIGBUS 10 (MIPS)
> Hdefine SIGBUS 7 (I386)
>
> Hdefine SIGSTKFLT 16 (I386, doesn't exist on MIPS)
>
> Is there any reason for this ?
Time to read the ABI :-)
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-30 22:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-27 11:05 Signals Carsten Langgaard
2001-12-27 21:53 ` Signals Ralf Baechle
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.