From: Christer Weinigel <wingel@acolyte.hack.org>
To: dalecki@evision-ventures.com
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:22:39 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020523212239.EA736F5B@acolyte.hack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CED438B.6090906@evision-ventures.com> (message from Martin Dalecki on Thu, 23 May 2002 21:31:23 +0200)
Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
> "I will submitt my dual 8255 PIO ISA card driver from 1.xx days
> immediately for kernel inclusion"
Please do *grin* I will probably have to write a driver for just such
a card (a PC104 card though, but that's just a differenct connector),
so I'd love to have such a driver. And as long as the driver is
self-contained and doesn't mess with other parts of the kernel I can't
see why it shouldn't be included in Linus' tree. The same is IMHO
true about /dev/port, it's rather self-contained and is less than 50
source lines in mem.c. It may be ugly but it's useful for some people.
/Christer
--
"Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-23 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1022085725.386.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-05-23 17:07 ` [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-23 18:05 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 21:22 ` Christer Weinigel [this message]
2002-05-23 21:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-23 20:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 5:39 ` Robert Schwebel
2002-05-23 21:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-22 16:30 James Simmons
2002-05-22 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:39 ` James Simmons
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-21 5:16 Linux-2.5.17 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 9:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 10:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-22 9:46 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 10:54 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-22 10:13 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 11:26 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 10:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-22 12:36 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 13:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 12:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:38 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:04 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:03 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-05-22 15:07 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-22 14:07 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:21 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-22 15:19 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-27 9:04 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 14:54 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 15:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:10 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-22 12:20 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-05-23 7:30 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-23 6:44 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 8:26 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-22 13:16 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-22 12:30 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:50 ` Sebastian Droege
2002-05-22 13:52 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:49 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 12:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:56 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:49 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 13:59 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 13:12 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:33 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 13:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:16 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 16:31 ` James Simmons
2002-05-22 14:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-27 9:07 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 15:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 14:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 16:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 17:30 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 16:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 17:36 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 17:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-26 13:53 ` Riley Williams
2002-05-26 15:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-26 15:39 ` Riley Williams
2002-05-23 10:10 ` Martin Diehl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020523212239.EA736F5B@acolyte.hack.org \
--to=wingel@acolyte.hack.org \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.