From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: possible use-after-free in 2.5.44 scsi changes
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:20:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021027212035.GM3966@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210270050.g9R0oQe04795@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Oct 26 2002, James Bottomley wrote:
> axboe@suse.de said:
> > Irk no, you cannot just clear valid information! This is _not_ a fix,
> > it's a hack.
>
> > Use a different flag, or maybe use REQ_DONTPREP or similar.
>
> OK, what about this. It uses REQ_DONTPREP, and could be a precursor
> to moving the SCSI subsystem to using the request prep function.
Sure that would suffice, but lets just move to the prep approach right
away. First just the global one, later we can do one per device type.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-27 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-25 1:39 possible use-after-free in 2.5.44 scsi changes Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 4:06 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 14:21 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 4:07 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-25 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 18:49 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-25 19:08 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-25 19:41 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-25 19:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-25 22:14 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-25 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 22:23 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-26 0:13 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-26 0:18 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-26 9:29 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-27 0:50 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-27 21:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-10-27 21:37 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-27 21:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-30 17:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-30 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-30 19:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-30 21:36 ` merlin hughes
2002-10-30 22:19 ` Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-31 2:17 ` merlin
2002-10-31 13:18 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 14:41 ` merlin
2002-10-31 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 15:04 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-31 17:41 ` merlin
2002-10-30 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-30 22:03 ` Badari Pulavarty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 17:57 Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-31 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021027212035.GM3966@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.