From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, ak@muc.de, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com,
anton@samba.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Linus rollup
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030130004344.GH1237@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030129022617.62800a6e.akpm@digeo.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:26:17AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:59:49 +0000
> >
> > /* This function must be called with interrupts disabled
> >
> > which hasn't been true for some time, and is even less true now that
> > local IRQs don't get disabled. Does this matter... for UP?
> >
> > I disable local IRQs during gettimeofday() on sparc.
> >
> > These locks definitely need to be taken with IRQs disabled.
> > Why isn't x86 doing that?
>
> Darned if I know. Looks like Andrea's kernel will deadlock if
> arch/i386/kernel/time.c:timer_interrupt() takes i8253_lock
> while that cpu is holding the same lock in do_slow_gettimeoffset().
yes thanks! mostly theorical though, 486 SMP boxes aren't that common ;)
This should fix it.
--- 2.4.21pre3aa1/arch/i386/kernel/time.c.~1~ 2003-01-21 03:43:59.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.4.21pre3aa1/arch/i386/kernel/time.c 2003-01-30 01:40:37.000000000 +0100
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ extern spinlock_t i8259A_lock;
static unsigned long do_slow_gettimeoffset(void)
{
int count;
+ unsigned long flags;
static int count_p = LATCH; /* for the first call after boot */
static unsigned long jiffies_p = 0;
@@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ static unsigned long do_slow_gettimeoffs
unsigned long jiffies_t;
/* gets recalled with irq locally disabled */
- spin_lock(&i8253_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&i8253_lock, flags);
/* timer count may underflow right here */
outb_p(0x00, 0x43); /* latch the count ASAP */
@@ -191,7 +192,7 @@ static unsigned long do_slow_gettimeoffs
count = LATCH - 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&i8253_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8253_lock, flags);
/*
* avoiding timer inconsistencies (they are rare, but they happen)...
@@ -212,13 +213,13 @@ static unsigned long do_slow_gettimeoffs
int i;
- spin_lock(&i8259A_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
/*
* This is tricky when I/O APICs are used;
* see do_timer_interrupt().
*/
i = inb(0x20);
- spin_unlock(&i8259A_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
/* assumption about timer being IRQ0 */
if (i & 0x01) {
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-30 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-29 6:07 Linus rollup Andrew Morton
2003-01-29 6:53 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-29 7:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 9:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-29 9:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 9:54 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-01-29 9:59 ` Russell King
2003-01-29 9:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-29 22:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-01-29 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-30 0:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-30 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-30 1:24 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-30 2:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-30 1:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-30 1:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-01-30 2:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 17:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-01-30 17:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-30 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-30 17:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-30 1:52 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-30 2:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 1:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 2:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-30 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-01-30 17:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 2:00 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-30 0:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-01-30 0:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2003-01-29 10:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-29 17:04 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-29 17:25 ` Russell King
2003-01-29 19:05 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030130004344.GH1237@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.